Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diaphyseal forearm fracture management in adolescent patients from 2011 to 2020: A multicenter study of surgery and regional anesthesia trends.
Kimura, Yoshihiko; Asami, Yuta; Tokutake, Katsuhiro; Takegami, Yasuhiko; Oshima, Kazuma; Ishihara, Noriko; Imagama, Shiro.
Afiliação
  • Kimura Y; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seirei Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Asami Y; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Yokkaichi, Japan. Electronic address: yuta0862@yahoo.co.jp.
  • Tokutake K; Department of Human Enhancement and Hand Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Takegami Y; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Oshima K; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan.
  • Ishihara N; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shizuoka Saiseikai General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Imagama S; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
J Orthop Sci ; 2024 Apr 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589270
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Diaphyseal forearm fractures are common traumatic injuries among children. There has been much debate on the use of intramedullary nailing (IMN) or plate fixation in the adolescent population (10-16 years of age). Furthermore, as ultrasound technology has advanced, the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block for children has dramatically improved. Therefore, anesthesia options for adolescent patients have increased in recent years. This study aimed to investigate recent surgical and regional anesthesia trends of diaphyseal forearm fractures in patients 10 to 16 years of age in Japan through a multicenter epidemiological survey from 2011 to 2020.

METHODS:

This retrospective, multicenter study included 226 pediatric patients with diaphyseal forearm fracture aged 10-16 years treated from January 2011 to December 2020. We divided the patients into four groups according to the period in which they were treated early (2011-2013), middle (2014-2016), late (2017-2019), and COVID-19 (2020). Information from medical records was used to investigate the number of surgeries, types of anesthesia administered, and internal fixation methods used for diaphyseal forearm fracture in adolescent patients during each period.

RESULTS:

The number of surgeries was generally constant in each period but decreased during the COVID-19 period. In the early, middle, late, and COVID-19 periods, the percentages of surgeries performed under regional anesthesia were 67.7, 85.5, 87.0, and 100% respectively (p = 0.003). During the same periods, the percentages of patients receiving IMN were 41.5, 49.3, 58.0, and 66.7%, respectively (p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION:

The use of IMN and regional anesthesia to treat diaphyseal forearm fracture in patients 10 to 16 years of age steadily increased during the study period from 2011 to 2020. These results indicate that regional anesthesia is safe, effective, and well-tolerated by adolescent patients. The treatment strategy for diaphyseal forearm fractures in adolescents using regional anesthesia in combination with IMN worked well and was effective during COVID-19. Our evidence suggests this trend will continue. We anticipate that our findings can be extrapolated for upper extremity fractures in adolescent patients beyond the Tokai region of Japan where the study was based.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article