Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigation of the Surface Roughness and Hardness of Different Denture Teeth Materials: An In vitro Study.
Garg, Kanav; Kaur, Impreet; Vala, Akshaysinh P; Deepashree, C; Nair, Vishnuja V R; John, Nivya.
Afiliação
  • Garg K; MDS (Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge), Consultant Prosthodontist, Patiala, Punjab, India.
  • Kaur I; Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Punjab Government Dental College and Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
  • Vala AP; Department of Periodontics, Goenka Research Institutes of Dental Sciences, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
  • Deepashree C; Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, V. S. Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • Nair VVR; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, KVG Dental College and Hospital, Sullia, Karnataka, India.
  • John N; Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Implantology, AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte Deemed to be University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci ; 16(Suppl 1): S427-S430, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38595483
ABSTRACT

Background:

Surface roughness and hardness are key factors that influence the clinical performance and durability of denture teeth. Understanding variations in these properties among different denture teeth materials can assist in selecting the most suitable materials for optimal patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the surface roughness and hardness of four commonly used denture teeth materials acrylic resin, composite resin, porcelain, and nanohybrid composite. Materials and

Methods:

Ten specimens were prepared for each denture teeth material, resulting in a total of 40 specimens. Surface roughness was assessed using a profilometer, and measurements were recorded in micrometers (µm). Hardness was determined using a Vickers hardness tester, and results were expressed as Vickers hardness numbers (VHN). The surface roughness and hardness data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests (e.g., analysis of variance), with significance set at P < 0.05.

Results:

The results revealed significant differences in both surface roughness and hardness among the different denture teeth materials (P < 0.05). Acrylic resin exhibited the highest surface roughness (mean ± standard deviation 3.45 ± 0.78 µm) and the lowest hardness (mean ± standard deviation 45.6 ± 2.3 VHN). Composite resin demonstrated intermediate values of surface roughness (mean ± standard deviation 1.87 ± 0.54 µm) and hardness (mean ± standard deviation 65.2 ± 3.9 VHN). Porcelain demonstrated the smoothest surface (mean ± standard deviation 0.94 ± 0.28 µm) and the highest hardness (mean ± standard deviation 78.5 ± 4.1 VHN). Nanohybrid composite displayed surface roughness and hardness values similar to composite resin.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrated significant variations in surface roughness and hardness among the different denture teeth materials evaluated. Acrylic resin exhibited the roughest surface and lowest hardness, while porcelain demonstrated the smoothest surface and highest hardness. Composite resin and nanohybrid composite exhibited intermediate values. These findings provide valuable insights for prosthodontic practitioners in selecting denture teeth materials based on specific clinical requirements, aiming to achieve optimal aesthetics, reduced plaque accumulation, and improved wear resistance.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article