Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Advantages of Spinal Anesthesia in Lumbar Disk Surgery.
Akgun, Mehmet Yigit; Orak, Helin Ilkay; Akgul, Mehmet Huseyin; Ates, Ozkan.
Afiliação
  • Akgun MY; Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Orak HI; Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Akgul MH; Department of Neurosurgery, Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Kirikkale, Turkey.
  • Ates O; Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg ; 85(5): 439-443, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599624
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Quality of life (QoL) may be affected due to various reasons such as low back or leg pains with accompanying neurologic problems. Lumbar disk surgery is one of the most common performed surgeries to relieve those symptoms. Various anesthetic techniques can be used safely to perform lumbar disk surgeries. Properties that make an anesthetic technique good are mainly the quick onset and returning of the effects. This large retrospective study with patients who have undergone lumbar disk surgery under spinal anesthesia aims to evaluate the perioperative and postoperative parameters of the spinal anesthesia and review the literature.

METHODS:

Cases operated under spinal anesthesia between January 2017 and December 2020 were investigated, and 617 patients who underwent simple lumbar disk surgery were included in the study. Demographic characteristics and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of the patients were recorded. Visual analog scale (VAS) and QoLscores were obtained before and after the operation.

RESULTS:

There were 282 (45.7%) male and 335 (54.3%) female patients with a mean age of 39.48 ± 16.71 years (range 18-58 years) at symptom onset. The mean operating time was 46.3 minutes (range 22-68 minutes). Average blood loss was 85 mL (range 55-125 mL). All the patients were mobilized 6 to 12 hours after surgery. In our patient group, there were both high- and normal-risk groups in terms of the ASA physical status. During the clinical follow-up, a statistically significant improvement was found for the VAS and QoL scores (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this large retrospective study, our results have confirmed that spinal anesthesia is at least comparable to general anesthesia and even superior to it in some aspects.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raquianestesia / Vértebras Lombares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raquianestesia / Vértebras Lombares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article