Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluate effect of 126 pre-processing methods on various artificial intelligence models accuracy versus normal mode to predict groundwater level (case study: Hamedan-Bahar Plain, Iran).
Saroughi, Mohsen; Mirzania, Ehsan; Achite, Mohammed; Katipoglu, Okan Mert; Al-Ansari, Nadhir; Vishwakarma, Dinesh Kumar; Chung, Il-Moon; Alreshidi, Maha Awjan; Yadav, Krishna Kumar.
Afiliação
  • Saroughi M; Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
  • Mirzania E; Department of Water Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
  • Achite M; Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, Laboratory of Water and Environment, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, Chlef, 02180, Algeria.
  • Katipoglu OM; Department of Civil Engineering, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Turkey.
  • Al-Ansari N; Department of Civil, Environmental, and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187, Lulea, Sweden.
  • Vishwakarma DK; Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India.
  • Chung IM; Department of Water Resources and River Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang-si, 10223, Republic of Korea.
  • Alreshidi MA; Department of Chemistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, 81441, Saudi Arabia.
  • Yadav KK; Faculty of Science and Technology, Madhyanchal Professional University, Ratibad, Bhopal, 462044, India.
Heliyon ; 10(7): e29006, 2024 Apr 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38601575
ABSTRACT
The estimation of groundwater levels is crucial and an important step in ensuring sustainable management of water resources. In this paper, selected piezometers of the Hamedan-Bahar plain located in west of Iran. The main objective of this study is to compare effect of various pre-processing methods on input data for different artificial intelligence (AI) models to predict groundwater levels (GWLs). The observed GWL, evaporation, precipitation, and temperature were used as input variables in the AI algorithms. Firstly, 126 method of data pre-processing was done by python programming which are classified into three classes 1- statistical methods, 2- wavelet transform methods and 3- decomposition methods; later, various pre-processed data used by four types of widely used AI models with different kernels, which includes Support Vector Machine (SVR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Long-Short Term memory (LSTM), and Pelican Optimization Algorithm (POA) - Artificial Neural Network (POA-ANN) are classified into three classes 1- machine learning (SVR and ANN), 2- deep learning (LSTM) and 3- hybrid-ML (POA-ANN) models, to predict groundwater levels (GWLs). Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were used to evaluate and validate the predictive accuracy of algorithms. According to the results, based on summation (train and test phases) of AIC value of 1778 models, average of AIC values for ML, DL, hybrid-ML classes, was decreased to -25.3%, -29.6% and -57.8%, respectively. Therefore, the results showed that all data pre-processing methods do not lead to improvement of prediction accuracy, and they should be selected very carefully by trial and error. In conclusion, wavelet-ANN model with daubechies 13 and 25 neurons (db13_ANN_25) is the best model to predict GWL that has -204.9 value for AIC which has grown by 5.23% (-194.7) compared to the state without any pre-processing method (ANN_Relu_25).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article