Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion in characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
Kaur, Gurkawal; Manchanda, Smita; Sharma, Raju; Vyas, Surabhi; Kandasamy, Devasenathipathy; Hari, Smriti; Bhatla, Neerja; Mathur, Sandeep R.
Afiliação
  • Kaur G; Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Manchanda S; Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. smitamanchanda@gmail.com.
  • Sharma R; Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Vyas S; Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Kandasamy D; Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Hari S; Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Bhatla N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Mathur SR; Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 49(5): 1512-1521, 2024 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38607571
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the role of conventional diffusion weighted imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in distinguishing benign from malignant adnexal masses.

METHODS:

38 patients with 45 adnexal masses were enrolled in this prospective study and assessed with multiparametric MRI, including the IVIM-DKI sequence, on a 3 T MRI system. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from conventional DWI, the apparent diffusion coefficient derived from DKI (Dapp), the apparent kurtosis coefficient (Kapp), true diffusion coefficient (Dt), perfusion fraction (f) and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (Dp) were measured.

RESULTS:

The mean ADC, Dapp, and Dt were significantly higher in benign adnexal masses than in malignant adnexal masses (p < 0.001). f and Dp were also significantly higher in benign adnexal masses, with p values of 0.026 and 0.002, respectively. Kapp was higher in malignant masses (p < 0.001). Among mean ADC, Dapp, and Dt, mean ADC had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.885. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the ROCs of various diffusion parameters.

CONCLUSION:

The mean ADC, Dapp, and Kapp are useful parameters in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Dt derived from IVIM also helps in distinguishing benign and malignant adnexal masses; however, no incremental role of IVIM and DKI over ADC could be identified in our study.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças dos Anexos / Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças dos Anexos / Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article