Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ambulatory facial feminization surgery: a comparative analysis of outcomes and complications.
Nguyen, Nghiem; Doan, Leandra; Jiang, Fang; Chu, Michael W; Liu, Yuan Y; Francis, Stacey H; Kim, Holly; Lee, James C.
Afiliação
  • Nguyen N; Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Doan L; Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Jiang F; Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Chu MW; Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Plastic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Liu YY; Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Francis SH; Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Plastic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Kim H; Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Lee JC; Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Plastic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: drjamescleemd@gmail.com.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 93: 30-35, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631083
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To date, there are no studies investigating the safety and outcomes of facial feminization surgery (FFS) as an outpatient procedure. This is the first study of its kind analyzing the outcomes of ambulatory FFS based on a comparison of complications, post-operative emergency department or urgent care (ED/UC) visits, and readmissions between patients who underwent FFS with admission versus same-day surgery.

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients who underwent FFS in a single integrated healthcare system. Patient charts were reviewed for operative details, complications, post-operative ED/UC visits, readmission, and demographic factors. Major outcomes including complications, readmissions, and ED/UC visits were compared between groups with same-day discharge and post-operative hospital admission.

RESULTS:

Of 242 patients included in the study, ED/UC visits were comparable between patients discharged same-day (18.2%) and patients admitted post-operatively (21.6%, p = 0.52). Logistic regression showed no significant difference in the composite outcomes of minor complications, major complications, and readmissions (15.6% for ambulatory versus 19.3% for admission, p = 0.46). Temporary nerve palsy, infection, and hematoma were the most common post-operative complications. However, covariates of a lower face procedure and operative time were shown to have significant differences in the composite complication outcome (p = 0.04 and p = 0.045, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

Ambulatory FFS is a safe practice with no associated increase in adverse outcomes including complications, ED/UC visits, and readmission when compared to post-operative admission. Adoption of same-day FFS should be considered by high-volume gender health centers to potentially benefit from increased scheduling flexibility and efficiency, increased access to care, and lower healthcare costs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Readmissão do Paciente / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Readmissão do Paciente / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article