Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating the impact of a UK recovery college on mental well-being: pre- and post-intervention study.
Allard, Jon; Pollard, Adam; Laugharne, Richard; Coates, Jamie; Wildfire-Roberts, Julia; Millward, Michelle; Shankar, Rohit.
Afiliação
  • Allard J; Research Team, Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bodmin, UK; and Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), University of Plymouth Peninsula School of Medicine, UK.
  • Pollard A; Research Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro, UK.
  • Laugharne R; Research Team, Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bodmin, UK; and Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), University of Plymouth Peninsula School of Medicine, UK.
  • Coates J; Recovery College Cornwall, Pentreath Ltd, Truro, UK.
  • Wildfire-Roberts J; Recovery College Cornwall, Pentreath Ltd, Truro, UK.
  • Millward M; Recovery College Cornwall, Pentreath Ltd, Truro, UK.
  • Shankar R; Research Team, Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bodmin, UK; and Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), University of Plymouth Peninsula School of Medicine, UK.
BJPsych Open ; 10(3): e87, 2024 Apr 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38634329
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Recovery colleges provide personalised educational mental health support for people who self-refer. The research evidence supporting them is growing, with key components and the positive experiences of attendees reported. However, the quantitative outcome evidence and impact on economic outcomes is limited.

AIMS:

To evaluate the impact of attending a UK recovery college for students who receive a full educational intervention.

METHOD:

This is a pre- and post-intervention study, with predominantly quantitative methods. Participants recruited over an 18-month period (01.2020-07.2021) completed self-reported well-being (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS)) and recovery (Process of Recovery (QPR)) surveys, and provided details and evidence of employment and educational status. Descriptive statistics for baseline data and Shapiro-Wilk, Wilcoxon signed-rank and paired t-tests were used to compare pre- and post-intervention scores, with Hedges' g-statistic as a measure of effect size. Medical records were reviewed and a brief qualitative assessment of changes reported by students was conducted.

RESULTS:

Of 101 student research participants, 84 completed the intervention. Well-being (mean SWEMWBS scores 17.3 and 21.9; n = 80) and recovery (mean QPR scores 27.2 and 38.8; n = 75) improved significantly (P < 0.001; Hedges' g of 1.08 and 1.03). The number of economically inactive students reduced from 53 (69%) to 19 (24.4%). No research participants were referred for specialist mental health support while students. 'Within-self' and 'practical' changes were described by students following the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS:

Findings detail the largest self-reported pre-post data-set for students attending a recovery college, and the first data detailing outcomes of remote delivery of a recovery college.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article