Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reporting of interventional clinical trial results in an academic center: a survey of completed studies.
Alix-Doucet, Anne Sophie; Vinatier, Constant; Fin, Loïc; Léna, Hervé; Rangé, Hélène; Locher, Clara; Naudet, Florian.
Afiliação
  • Alix-Doucet AS; Research and Innovation Department, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
  • Vinatier C; Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé Environnement Et Travail)-UMR_S 1085, CIC 1414 [(Centre d'investigation clinique de Rennes)], F- 35000, Rennes, France.
  • Fin L; Research and Innovation Department, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
  • Léna H; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Hôpital de Pontchaillou, INSERM U 1242, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
  • Rangé H; CIC 1414 [(Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Rennes)], Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, Institut Numecan (Nutrition, Métabolismes Et Cancer) -UMR_S 1317, Rennes, France.
  • Locher C; Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé Environnement Et Travail)-UMR_S 1085, CIC 1414 [(Centre d'investigation clinique de Rennes)], F- 35000, Rennes, France.
  • Naudet F; Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé Environnement Et Travail)-UMR_S 1085, CIC 1414 [(Centre d'investigation clinique de Rennes)], F- 35000, Rennes, France. floriannaudet@gmail.com.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 24(1): 93, 2024 Apr 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649798
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The dissemination of clinical trial results is an important scientific and ethical endeavour. This survey of completed interventional studies in a French academic center describes their reporting status.

METHODS:

We explored all interventional studies sponsored by Rennes University Hospital identified on the French Open Science Monitor which tracks trials registered on EUCTR or clinicaltrials.gov, and provides an automatic assessment of the reporting of results. For each study, we ascertained the actual reporting of results using systematic searches on the hospital internal database, bibliographic databases (Google Scholar, PubMed), and by contacting all principal investigators (PIs). We describe several features (including total budget and numbers of trial participants) of the studies that did not report any results.

RESULTS:

The French Open Science Monitor identified 93 interventional studies, among which 10 (11%) reported results. In contrast, our survey identified 36 studies (39%) reporting primary analysis results and an additional 18 (19%) reporting results for secondary analyses (without results for their primary analysis). The overall budget for studies that did not report any results was estimated to be €5,051,253 for a total of 6,735 trial participants. The most frequent reasons for the absence of results reported by PIs were lack of time for 18 (42%), and logistic difficulties (e.g. delay in obtaining results or another blocking factor) for 12 (28%). An association was found between non-publication and negative results (adjusted Odds Ratio = 4.70, 95% Confidence Interval [1.67;14.11]).

CONCLUSIONS:

Even allowing for the fact that automatic searches underestimate the number of studies with published results, the level of reporting was disappointingly low. This amounts to a waste of trial participants' implication and money. Corrective actions are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION https//osf.io/q5hcs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article