Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Four-dimensional impedance manometry volume metrics for predicting abnormal bolus retention.
Pitisuttithum, Panyavee; Goudie, Eric; Araujo, Isis K; Halder, Sourav; Carlson, Dustin A; Pandolfino, John E; Kou, Wenjun.
Afiliação
  • Pitisuttithum P; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Goudie E; Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Araujo IK; Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Halder S; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Carlson DA; Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Pandolfino JE; Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Kou W; Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 36(7): e14803, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676387
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The objective measurement for esophageal bolus volume and bolus clearance could classify abnormal high-resolution manometry (HRM) beyond the current Chicago classification. We aimed to compare the novel four-dimensional impedance manometry (4D HRM) volume metrics with timed barium esophagram (TBE).

METHODS:

Adults with esophageal symptoms undergoing HRM and TBE were included. A custom-built program for 4D HRM analysis measured esophageal luminal cross-sectional area (CSA) from impedance and subsequently derived esophageal bolus volume and clearance. 4D HRM volume metrics included pre-swallow residual volume, maximal volume, retention volume, and clearance ratio defined as 1.0-retention volume divided by the maximal volume. An abnormal TBE was defined as a column height >5 cm at 1 min or 5 min. KEY

RESULTS:

A total of 95 patients (normal motility 33%; ineffective esophageal motility 12%; absent contractility 10%; esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction 30%; type I achalasia 5%; type II achalasia 12%) were categorized into normal TBE (58%), abnormal TBE at 1 min (17%), and abnormal TBE at 5 min (25%). The AUROC demonstrated that, among all 4D HRM volume metrics, the clearance ratio had the best performance in predicting abnormal TBE at 5 min (AUROC, 95% confidence interval 0.89, 0.82-0.96), and exhibited a strong negative correlation with TBE at 5 min (r = -0.65; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Novel 4D HRM volume metrics provide objective measurement of esophageal bolus volume and bolus clearance. The clearance ratio has a strong correlation with TBE and could potentially serve as a substitute for TBE to measure esophageal retention.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica / Impedância Elétrica / Manometria Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica / Impedância Elétrica / Manometria Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article