[Results of a cohort single-center randomized study of the modulating effect of the drug Mexidol in the rehabilitation of patients who suffered acute cerebral insufficiency]. / Rezul'taty kogortnogo odnotsentrovogo randomizirovannogo issledovaniya moduliruyushchego effekta preparata Meksidol v reabilitatsii patsientov, perenesshikh ostruyu tserebral'nuyu nedostatochnost'.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the effect of pharmacological modulation of the rehabilitation process with the drug mexidol as an adjuvant component of the rehabilitation treatment of cognitive-emotional disorders in patients who have suffered acute cerebral insufficiency (ACI) due to acute cerebrovascular accident or traumatic brain injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted as a randomized interventional prospective study and consisted of 5 visits. Patients were divided into 2 groups main (n=30, standard therapy + Mexidol IV 500 mg per day for 10 days, followed by Mexidol FORTE 250 orally, 1 tablet 3 times a day for 8 weeks) and control (n=30, standard therapy for 66 days). RESULTS: The study randomized 60 patients who underwent ACN and received rehabilitation treatment in accordance with regional routing. In the main group, there was an improvement in cognitive functions comparable to the control group (p<0.001, in both groups there was an improvement in the Schulte test «work efficiency¼ and «total execution time¼, according to the MoCA scale (visit 5 - 23.8±2.6 vs 22.9±31, p=0.227). A significant superiority of the main group over the control group was shown in such indicators as a decrease in anxiety (according to the HADS scale) (visit 4 - 2.6±2.4 vs 4.4±2.4, p=0.004), a decrease in the severity of depression (according to the Beck scale) (visit 3 - 7.5±4.5 vs 11.4±5.6, p=0.005). There was a tendency for the main group to be superior in terms of muscle strength (according to the MRC scale (visit 4 - 3.3±5.1 vs 2.1±2.2, p=0.051), level of vital activity (according to the ShRM - visit 5 - 2.9±0.7 vs 3.3±0.6, p=0.053). A statistically significant increase in the level of mobility of patients in the group using the drug Mexidol was proven compared to the control group (the difference in the Rivermead index at the 5th visit was 10.3±2.8 and 8.0±2.8, respectively, p=0.006), the average increase in the Rivermead index by visit 5 (5.4±2.1 vs 3.4±1.6, p<0.001). A decrease in intensive care aftereffects syndrome (ITS) scores was detected in both groups; a statistically significant decrease in the severity of ITS in relation to the previous visit was detected only in the group using the drug Mexidol (p<0.001). In the main group, the best indicators of the dynamics of systolic cerebral blood flow velocity and overshoot coefficient were also determined, compared to the control group. There were no adverse events recorded in the study. CONCLUSION: A positive modulating effect of Mexidol has been demonstrated in terms of accelerating the restoration of tolerance to cognitive loads, improving the psycho-emotional background by reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression, and secondary improving the results of motor rehabilitation in the early recovery period in patients who have undergone ACI, including those with manifestations of PIT syndrome. During the study, no adverse events were recorded, as well as significant differences in vital functions in the study groups, which indicates comparable safety of therapy in the control and main groups.