Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fatigue and Metabolic Responses during Repeated Sets of Bench Press Exercise to Exhaustion at Different Ranges of Motion.
Tsoukos, Athanasios; Krzysztofik, Michal; Wilk, Michal; Zajac, Adam; Panagiotopoulos, Michail G; Psarras, Ilias-Iason; Petraki, Despina P; Terzis, Gerasimos; Bogdanis, Gregory C.
Afiliação
  • Tsoukos A; School of Physical Education and Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Krzysztofik M; Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
  • Wilk M; Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
  • Zajac A; Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
  • Panagiotopoulos MG; School of Physical Education and Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Psarras II; School of Physical Education and Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Petraki DP; School of Physical Education and Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Terzis G; School of Physical Education and Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Bogdanis GC; School of Physical Education and Sports Science, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
J Hum Kinet ; 91(Spec Issue): 61-76, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689577
ABSTRACT
This study compared the acute effects of different ranges of motion (ROM) on fatigue and metabolic responses during repeated sets of bench press exercise. Ten resistance trained men performed three sets to momentary failure with two-min rest intervals at three different ROM full ROM (FULL), and partial ROM in which the barbell was moved either at the bottom half (BOTTOM) or the top half (TOP) of the full barbell vertical displacement. In TOP, a higher load was lifted, and a higher total number of repetitions was performed compared to FULL and BOTTOM (130 ± 17.6 vs. 102.5 ± 15.9 vs. 98.8 ± 17.5 kg; 55.2 ± 9.8, 32.2 ± 6.5 vs. 49.1 ± 16.5 kg, respectively p < 0.01). Work per repetition was higher in FULL than TOP and BOTTOM (283 ± 43 vs. 205 ± 32 vs. 164 ± 31 J/repetition, p < 0.01). Mean barbell velocity at the start of set 1 was 21.7% and 12.8% higher in FULL compared to TOP and BOTTOM, respectively. The rate of decline in mean barbell velocity was doubled from set 1 to set 3 (p < 0.01) and was higher in FULL than both TOP and BOTTOM (p < 0.001). Also, the rate of mean barbell velocity decline was higher in BOTTOM compared to TOP (p = 0.045). Blood lactate concentration was similarly increased in all ROM (p < 0.001). Training at TOP ROM allowed not only to lift a higher load, but also to perform more repetitions with a lower rate of decline in mean barbell velocity. Despite the lower absolute load and work per repetition, fatigue was higher in BOTTOM than TOP and this may be attributed to differences in muscle length.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article