Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Elective Pelvic Lymph Node Radiation Therapy and the Risk of Death in Patients With Unfavorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Postrandomization Analysis.
Sayan, Mutlay; Chen, Ming-Hui; Loffredo, Marian; McMahon, Elizabeth; Moningi, Shalini; Orio, Peter F; Nguyen, Paul L; D'Amico, Anthony V.
Afiliação
  • Sayan M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
  • Chen MH; Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
  • Loffredo M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
  • McMahon E; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
  • Moningi S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
  • Orio PF; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
  • Nguyen PL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
  • D'Amico AV; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
J Clin Oncol ; 42(21): 2558-2564, 2024 Jul 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691823
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Although a contemporary randomized clinical trial has led to the use of whole-pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT), long-term data evaluating a potential reduction in mortality are lacking and are addressed in the current study. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

From 2005 to 2015, 350 men with localized, unfavorable-risk prostate cancer (PC) were randomly assigned to receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and RT plus docetaxel versus ADT and RT. Treatment of the pelvic lymph nodes was at the discretion of the treating physician. Multivariable Cox and Fine and Grays regression analyses were performed to assess whether a significant association existed between radiation treatment volume and all-cause mortality (ACM) and PC-specific mortality (PCSM), respectively, adjusting for known PC prognostic factors and comorbidity. An interaction term between age (categorized by dichotomization at 65 years to enable clinical interpretation and applicability of the results and which approximates the median (66 years [IQR, 61-70]) and radiation treatment volume was included in the analysis.

RESULTS:

After a median follow-up of 10.20 years (IQR, 7.96-11.41), 89 men died (25.43%); of these, 42 died of PC (47.19%). Of the 350 randomly assigned patients, 88 (25.14%) received WPRT. In men younger than 65 years, WPRT was associated with a significantly lower ACM risk (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.33 [95% CI, 0.11 to 0.97]; P = .04) and lower PCSM risk (AHR, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.02 to 1.35]; P = .09) after adjusting for covariates, whereas this was not the case for men 65 years or older.

CONCLUSION:

WPRT has the potential to reduce mortality in younger men with unfavorable-risk PC.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pelve / Neoplasias da Próstata Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pelve / Neoplasias da Próstata Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article