Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimization and Local Cost-Effectiveness of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Screening Strategies in Southern China: Secondary Analysis of the Guangdong Randomized Trial.
Miller, Jacob A; Liu, Zhiwei; Pinsky, Benjamin A; Le, Quynh-Thu; Li, Tong; Yu, Kelly J; Hildesheim, Allan; Cao, Su-Mei.
Afiliação
  • Miller JA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Liu Z; Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Pinsky BA; Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
  • Le QT; Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Li T; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Yu KJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Hildesheim A; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
  • Cao SM; Department of Cancer Prevention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 33(7): 884-895, 2024 Jul 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695706
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Screening with anti-Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology and endoscopy decreased nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) mortality in Guangdong in a randomized trial. We conducted a secondary analysis of this trial using local incidence and cost data to optimize screening programs, hypothesizing that screening could be cost-effective in southern China.

METHODS:

Screening costs and life-years after NPC diagnosis were obtained from the Guangdong trial's intent-to-screen population (men and women aged 30-69). Seropositive subjects were rescreened annually for 5 years. Thereafter, we evaluated 12 screening strategies in Guangdong and Guangxi using a validated model. Strategies used combinations of serology, nasopharyngeal swab PCR (NP PCR), endoscopy, and MRI from trial subcohorts. Incidence data and costs were obtained from local cancer registries and the provincial healthcare system.

RESULTS:

In the intent-to-screen population, screening with serology and endoscopy was cost-effective (¥42,366/life-year, 0.52 GDP per capita). Screening for 5 to 15 years between ages 35 and 59 years met a willingness-to-pay threshold of 1.5 GDP/quality-adjusted life-years in all modeled populations. Despite doubling costs, adding MRI could be cost-effective via improved sensitivity. NP PCR triage reduced endoscopy/MRI referrals by 37%. One-lifetime screen could reduce NPC mortality by approximately 20%.

CONCLUSIONS:

EBV-based serologic screening for NPC is likely to be cost-effective in southern China. Among seropositive subjects, the preferred strategies use endoscopy alone or selective endoscopy triaged by MRI with or without NP PCR. These data may aid the design of screening programs in this region. IMPACT These findings support population-based screening in southern China by defining the target population, cost-effectiveness, and optimized screening approach.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas / Análise Custo-Benefício / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas / Análise Custo-Benefício / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article