Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Population-level Prevalence of Exocrine Pancreas Insufficiency and the Subsequent Risk of Pancreatic Cancer.
Babajide, Oyedotun; Desai, Aakash; Eruchalu, Chinelo; Sedarous, Mary; Adekunle, Deborah; Youssef, Michael; Mahmud, Muftah; Okafor, Philip N.
Afiliação
  • Babajide O; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York Medical College/Metropolitan Hospital Program, New York.
  • Desai A; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Eruchalu C; University of Central Florida, Orange County, Florida.
  • Sedarous M; Division of Gastroenterology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Adekunle D; Division of Internal Medicine, St. Luke's Hospital, Chesterfield, Missouri.
  • Youssef M; Division of Internal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Mahmud M; Division of Internal Medicine, Midwestern University, Verde Valley Internal Medicine Program, Arizona.
  • Okafor PN; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Florida.
Pancreas ; 2024 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696443
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To study the prevalence of exocrine pancreas insufficiency (EPI) at a population level and the subsequent risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS:

Using TriNetX (a database of over 79 million US residents), we included patients ≥18 years with EPI (identified via ICD-10 codes) and continuous follow-up from 2016-2022. Patients with prior pancreas resection and PDAC before an EPI diagnosis were excluded. The primary outcome was EPI prevalence. Secondary outcomes included imaging utilization, PDAC risk and, pancreas enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) utilization. We performed 11 propensity score matching of patients with EPI vs. patients without an EPI diagnosis. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals were reported.

RESULTS:

The population prevalence of EPI was 0.8% (n = 24,080) with a mean age of 55.6 years at diagnosis. After propensity score matching, PDAC risk among patients with EPI was twice as high compared to patients without EPI (AHR 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66-2.36). This risk persisted even after excluding patients with a history of acute or chronic pancreatitis (aOR 4.25, 95% CI 2.99-6.04). Only 58% (n = 13, 390) of patients with EPI received PERT with a mean treatment duration of 921 days. No difference was observed in PDAC risk between patients with EPI treated with PERT vs. those that did not receive PERT (AHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95-1.26, p = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite a low prevalence, patients with EPI may have a higher risk of PDAC and many of these patients with EPI were not on PERT. PERT did not appear to impact incident PDAC risk after an EPI diagnosis.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article