Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automated algorithm aided capacity and confidence boost in surgical decision-making training for inferior clivus.
Tang, Ke; Bu, Bo; Tian, Hongcheng; Li, Yang; Jiang, Xingwang; Qian, Zenghui; Zhou, Yiqiang.
Afiliação
  • Tang K; Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Bu B; Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Tian H; Department of Information, Medical Supplies Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Li Y; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
  • Jiang X; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Qian Z; Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Zhou Y; Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Front Surg ; 11: 1375861, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699561
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To assess the impact of automated algorithms on the trainees' decision-making capacity and confidence for individualized surgical planning.

Methods:

At Chinese PLA General Hospital, trainees were enrolled to undergo decision-making capacity and confidence training through three alternative visual tasks of the inferior clivus model formed from an automated algorithm and given consecutively in three exemplars. The rationale of automated decision-making was used to instruct each trainee.

Results:

Following automated decision-making calculation in 50 skull base models, we screened out three optimal plans, infra-tubercle approach (ITA), trans-tubercle approach (TTA), and supra-tubercle approach (STA) for 41 (82.00%), 8 (16.00%), and 1 (2.00%) subject, respectively. From September 1, 2023, through November 17, 2023, 62 trainees (median age [range] 27 [26-28]; 28 [45.16%] female; 25 [40.32%] neurosurgeons) made a decision among the three plans for the three typical models (ITA, TTA, and STA exemplars). The confidence ratings had fine test-retest reliability (Spearman's rho 0.979; 95% CI 0.970 to 0.988) and criterion validity with time spent (Spearman's rho -0.954; 95%CI -0.963 to -0.945). Following instruction of automated decision-making, time spent (initial test 24.02 vs. 7.13 in ITA; 30.24 vs. 7.06 in TTA; 34.21 vs. 12.82 in STA) and total hits (initial test 30 vs. 16 in ITA; 37 vs. 17 in TTA; 42 vs. 28 in STA) reduced significantly; confidence ratings (initial test 2 vs. 4 in ITA; 2 vs. 4 in TTA; 1 vs. 3 in STA) increased correspondingly. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed for the above comparisons.

Conclusions:

The education tool generated by automated decision-making considers surgical freedom and injury risk for the individualized risk-benefit assessment, which may provide explicit information to increase trainees' decision-making capacity and confidence.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article