Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identification of Factors Associated with Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs That Preferentially Match Students Who Performed an Elective Rotation Before the Interview Process.
Levy, Kenneth H; Al Ramlawi, Akram; O'Sullivan, Lucy R; Cartagena-Reyes, Miguel A; Harris, Andrew B; LaPorte, Dawn M; Aiyer, Amiethab A.
Afiliação
  • Levy KH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Al Ramlawi A; CUNY School of Medicine, New York, New York.
  • O'Sullivan LR; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Cartagena-Reyes MA; American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Harris AB; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • LaPorte DM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Aiyer AA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706613
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The role of elective rotations in the orthopaedic residency selection process varies between programs. Our study aims to identify factors associated with residency programs that interview and match a greater proportion of applicants who have completed an elective rotation with their program.

Methods:

Data were collected through the American Orthopaedic Association's Orthopaedic Residency Information Network database. Bivariate correlations and multivariate regression models were used to identify independent predictors of programs with a greater proportion of interviewees or residents who completed an elective rotation at the respective program.

Results:

One hundred seventy-eight of the 218 existing residency programs were included in this study. Programs that offered fewer interviews and more away rotation positions per year were associated with a greater odds of its interviewees (OR = 0.36, p = 0.01; OR = 4.55, p < 0.001, respectively) and residents (OR = 0.44, p = 0.04; OR = 4.23, p < 0.001, respectively) having completed an elective rotation with the program. In addition, programs with fewer attendings (OR = 0.39, p = 0.03) and in-person interviews (OR = 3.04, p = 0.04) matched a greater proportion of their rotators. However, programs that interviewed applicants during the elective rotation were less likely to match their rotators (OR = 0.35, p = 0.04).

Conclusion:

Certain program characteristics independently predict the likelihood of a program interviewing and matching their rotators. These findings may provide information for applicants and programs regarding the rotation process. Level of Evidence III.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article