Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improved interpretable machine learning emergency department triage tool addressing class imbalance.
Look, Clarisse Sj; Teixayavong, Salinelat; Djärv, Therese; Ho, Andrew Fw; Tan, Kenneth Bk; Ong, Marcus Eh.
Afiliação
  • Look CS; Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Teixayavong S; Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Djärv T; Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Ho AF; Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tan KB; Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Ong ME; Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Digit Health ; 10: 20552076241240910, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708185
ABSTRACT

Objective:

The Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP) is a novel mortality risk prediction score which leverages machine learning in supporting triage decisions. In its derivation study, SERP-2d, SERP-7d and SERP-30d demonstrated good predictive performance for 2-day, 7-day and 30-day mortality. However, the dataset used had significant class imbalance. This study aimed to determine if addressing class imbalance can improve SERP's performance, ultimately improving triage accuracy.

Methods:

The Singapore General Hospital (SGH) emergency department (ED) dataset was used, which contains 1,833,908 ED records between 2008 and 2020. Records between 2008 and 2017 were randomly split into a training set (80%) and validation set (20%). The 2019 and 2020 records were used as test sets. To address class imbalance, we used random oversampling and random undersampling in the AutoScore-Imbalance framework to develop SERP+-2d, SERP+-7d, and SERP+-30d scores. The performance of SERP+, SERP, and the commonly used triage risk scores was compared.

Results:

The developed SERP+ scores had five to six variables. The AUC of SERP+ scores (0.874 to 0.905) was higher than that of the corresponding SERP scores (0.859 to 0.894) on both test sets. This superior performance was statistically significant for SERP+-7d (2019 Z = -5.843, p < 0.001, 2020 Z = -4.548, p < 0.001) and SERP+-30d (2019 Z = -3.063, p = 0.002, 2020 Z = -3.256, p = 0.001). SERP+ outperformed SERP marginally on sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, and positive predictive value measures. Negative predictive value was the same for SERP+ and SERP. Additionally, SERP+ showed better performance compared to the commonly used triage risk scores.

Conclusions:

Accounting for class imbalance during training improved score performance for SERP+. Better stratification of even a small number of patients can be meaningful in the context of the ED triage. Our findings reiterate the potential of machine learning-based scores like SERP+ in supporting accurate, data-driven triage decisions at the ED.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article