Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk of acute pancreatitis among new users of empagliflozin compared to sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes: A post-authorization safety study.
Fazeli Farsani, Soulmaz; Iglay, Kristy; Zhang, Ling; Niyonkuru, Christian; Nessralla, Laurieann; Girman, Cynthia J.
Afiliação
  • Fazeli Farsani S; Global RWE Capability, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.
  • Iglay K; Real World Evidence and Patient Outcomes, CERobs Consulting, LLC, Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina, USA.
  • Zhang L; Global Integrated Evidence, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA.
  • Niyonkuru C; Global Integrated Evidence, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA.
  • Nessralla L; Global Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilence, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA.
  • Girman CJ; Real World Evidence and Patient Outcomes, CERobs Consulting, LLC, Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina, USA.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(5): e5800, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719731
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study was undertaken to evaluate the potential risk of acute pancreatitis with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) newly initiating empagliflozin.

METHODS:

Data from two large US claims databases were analyzed in an observational study of patients with T2D receiving metformin who were newly prescribed empagliflozin versus sulfonylurea (SU). Because dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have been associated with the risk of acute pancreatitis in some studies, patients on these agents were excluded. Using pooled analyses of data from the two databases (2014-2021), patients initiating empagliflozin were matched 11 within database to patients initiating SU using propensity scores (PS) that incorporated relevant demographic and clinical characteristics. Prespecified sensitivity analyses were performed for design parameters.

RESULTS:

The analyses identified 72 661 new users of empagliflozin and 422 018 new users of SUs, with both patient groups on concurrent metformin therapy. Baseline characteristics within treatment groups appeared to be similar across the 72 621 matched pairs. After mean follow-up of ~6 months, incidence rates of acute pancreatitis in the pooled matched cohort were 10.30 (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.29-11.39) events per 1000 patient-years (PY) for empagliflozin and 11.65 (95% CI 10.59-12.77) events per 1000 PY for SUs. On a background of metformin, patients newly initiating empagliflozin did not have an increased risk of acute pancreatitis compared with those initiating an SU (pooled PS matched hazard ratio 0.88 [0.76-1.02]) across 75621.42 PY of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this voluntary post-approval safety study provide additional evidence that the use of empagliflozin for the treatment of T2D is not associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pancreatite / Compostos de Sulfonilureia / Compostos Benzidrílicos / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Glucosídeos / Metformina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pancreatite / Compostos de Sulfonilureia / Compostos Benzidrílicos / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Glucosídeos / Metformina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article