Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Are Gait Patterns during In-Lab Running Representative of Gait Patterns during Real-World Training? An Experimental Study.
Davis, John J; Meardon, Stacey A; Brown, Andrew W; Raglin, John S; Harezlak, Jaroslaw; Gruber, Allison H.
Afiliação
  • Davis JJ; Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
  • Meardon SA; Department of Physical Therapy, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
  • Brown AW; Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
  • Raglin JS; Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
  • Harezlak J; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
  • Gruber AH; Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(9)2024 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38732998
ABSTRACT
Biomechanical assessments of running typically take place inside motion capture laboratories. However, it is unclear whether data from these in-lab gait assessments are representative of gait during real-world running. This study sought to test how well real-world gait patterns are represented by in-lab gait data in two cohorts of runners equipped with consumer-grade wearable sensors measuring speed, step length, vertical oscillation, stance time, and leg stiffness. Cohort 1 (N = 49) completed an in-lab treadmill run plus five real-world runs of self-selected distances on self-selected courses. Cohort 2 (N = 19) completed a 2.4 km outdoor run on a known course plus five real-world runs of self-selected distances on self-selected courses. The degree to which in-lab gait reflected real-world gait was quantified using univariate overlap and multivariate depth overlap statistics, both for all real-world running and for real-world running on flat, straight segments only. When comparing in-lab and real-world data from the same subject, univariate overlap ranged from 65.7% (leg stiffness) to 95.2% (speed). When considering all gait metrics together, only 32.5% of real-world data were well-represented by in-lab data from the same subject. Pooling in-lab gait data across multiple subjects led to greater distributional overlap between in-lab and real-world data (depth overlap 89.3-90.3%) due to the broader variability in gait seen across (as opposed to within) subjects. Stratifying real-world running to only include flat, straight segments did not meaningfully increase the overlap between in-lab and real-world running (changes of <1%). Individual gait patterns during real-world running, as characterized by consumer-grade wearable sensors, are not well-represented by the same runner's in-lab data. Researchers and clinicians should consider "borrowing" information from a pool of many runners to predict individual gait behavior when using biomechanical data to make clinical or sports performance decisions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Corrida / Marcha Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Corrida / Marcha Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article