Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Soft-tissue profile changes in adult patients treated with premolar extractions.
Albertini, Paolo; Barbara, Lorenza; Albertini, Enrico; Willeit, Paul; Lombardo, Luca.
Afiliação
  • Albertini P; From the Postgraduate School of Orthodontics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: dr.paoloalbertini@gmail.com.
  • Barbara L; From the Postgraduate School of Orthodontics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Albertini E; From the Postgraduate School of Orthodontics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Willeit P; From the Postgraduate School of Orthodontics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Lombardo L; From the Postgraduate School of Orthodontics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 166(2): 171-178, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762811
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The objective of this study was to identify the soft-tissue profile changes and the potential pretreatment cephalometric parameters that clinicians could use to predict the lip response after premolar extraction treatment in adult patients.

METHODS:

Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 75 white patients treated with premolar extractions were analyzed. The following initial cephalometric measurements were recorded upper and lower lip to E-plane, vermilion thickness, lip length, maxillary and mandibular incisor inclination, and mentolabial and nasolabial angle. Pretreatment and posttreatment radiographs were superimposed using the Björk structural method to record lip retraction and incisor/lip retraction ratio. Pearson correlation and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare lip retraction and incisor/lip retraction ratio with the cephalometric variables. The sample was divided according to different extraction patterns.

RESULTS:

The mean upper and lower lip retraction values were 1.4 mm and 1.7 mm, respectively. Vermilion thickness showed a negative and statistically significant correlation (P <0.05) with lip retraction and incisor/lip retraction ratio. In addition, the mean incisor/lip retraction ratio was 61% and 98% for the upper and lower thin lip, respectively, whereas the mean incisor/lip retraction ratio was 17% and 44% for the upper and lower thick lip, respectively. The comparison among extraction patterns did not highlight any noticeable difference.

CONCLUSIONS:

The choice of a specific extraction pattern did not impact lip response. The vermilion thickness was the key factor influencing lip retraction an increase in this parameter was related to a decrease in lip retraction and vice versa.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Extração Dentária / Dente Pré-Molar / Cefalometria / Lábio Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Extração Dentária / Dente Pré-Molar / Cefalometria / Lábio Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article