Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility of Amulet occluder implantation after failed left atrial appendage occlusion attempt: Insights from the EMERGE LAA postapproval study.
Makkar, Akash; Alkhouli, Mohamad; Ellis, Christopher R; Shah, Atman P; Coylewright, Megan; Freeman, James V; Anderson, Jordan A; Gage, Ryan; Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya.
Afiliação
  • Makkar A; Arizona Heart Arrhythmia Associates, Phoenix, Arizona. Electronic address: amakkar@azhaas.com.
  • Alkhouli M; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Ellis CR; Vanderbilt Heart Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Shah AP; The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Coylewright M; Erlanger and University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
  • Freeman JV; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Anderson JA; Abbott Structural Heart, Plymouth, Minnesota.
  • Gage R; Abbott Structural Heart, Plymouth, Minnesota.
  • Lakkireddy D; Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute and Research Foundation, Overland Park, Kansas.
Heart Rhythm ; 2024 May 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38768843
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although expertise in left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has grown, certain intricate anatomies may pose challenges, rendering them unsuitable for LAAO with the selected device.

OBJECTIVE:

This analysis aimed to characterize outcomes of patients with prior failed percutaneous LAAO procedures who underwent a subsequent attempt with an Amulet occluder in the EMERGE LAA postapproval study.

METHODS:

Patients enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry LAAO Registry who had an Amulet occluder implantation attempt between Food and Drug Administration approval (August 14, 2021) and June 30, 2023, were evaluated. A safety end point through 7 days or hospital discharge (whichever was later) and major adverse events through 45 days were reported.

RESULTS:

A total of 8591 patients underwent attempted Amulet occluder implantation, of whom 244 patients had prior failed LAAO. Implantation success was 88.9% and 96.2% in patients with prior failed LAAO and index LAAO, respectively (P < .001). The safety composite end point was low, occurring in 1.6% and 0.8% of patients with prior failed LAAO and index LAAO, respectively (P = .148). Any major adverse event through 45 days occurred in 7.4% and 6.3% of prior failed LAAO and index LAAO patient cohorts, respectively (P = .497); most adverse events were similar between the groups (P > .05). At 45 days, peridevice leak ≤3 mm was achieved in >90% of patients in either group.

CONCLUSION:

A high degree of implantation success with a low rate of adverse events can be achieved with the Amulet occluder. The findings imply that the dual occlusive mechanism Amulet occluder facilitates successful closure, even in challenging anatomic scenarios.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article