Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the standardization framework SSTR-RADS 1.0 for neuroendocrine tumors using the novel SSTR­targeting peptide [18F]SiTATE.
Ebner, R; Lohse, A; Fabritius, M P; Rübenthaler, J; Wängler, C; Wängler, B; Schirrmacher, R; Völter, F; Schmid, H P; Unterrainer, L M; Öcal, O; Hinterberger, A; Spitzweg, C; Auernhammer, C J; Geyer, T; Ricke, J; Bartenstein, P; Holzgreve, A; Grawe, F.
Afiliação
  • Ebner R; Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. ricarda.ebner@med.uni-muenchen.de.
  • Lohse A; Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Fabritius MP; Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Rübenthaler J; Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Wängler C; Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Wängler B; Biomedical Chemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Schirrmacher R; Biomedical Chemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Völter F; Molecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Schmid HP; Department of Oncology, Division of Oncological Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  • Unterrainer LM; Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Öcal O; Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Hinterberger A; Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Spitzweg C; Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Auernhammer CJ; DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Geyer T; Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Ricke J; Department of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Bartenstein P; Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Holzgreve A; Department of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Grawe F; Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eur Radiol ; 2024 May 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769164
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (SSTR-PET/CT) using [68Ga]-labeled tracers is a widely used imaging modality for neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Recently, [18F]SiTATE, a SiFAlin tagged [Tyr3]-octreotate (TATE) PET tracer, has shown great potential due to favorable clinical characteristics. We aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of Somatostatin Receptor-Reporting and Data System 1.0 (SSTR-RADS 1.0) for structured interpretation and treatment planning of NET using [18F]SiTATE.

METHODS:

Four readers assessed [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT of 95 patients according to the SSTR-RADS 1.0 criteria at two different time points. Each reader evaluated up to five target lesions per scan. The overall scan score and the decision on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) were considered. Inter- and intra-reader agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS:

The ICC analysis on the inter-reader agreement using SSTR-RADS 1.0 for identical target lesions (ICC ≥ 85%), overall scan score (ICC ≥ 90%), and the decision to recommend PRRT (ICC ≥ 85%) showed excellent agreement. However, significant differences were observed in recommending PRRT among experienced readers (ER) (p = 0.020) and inexperienced readers (IR) (p = 0.004). Compartment-based analysis demonstrated good to excellent inter-reader agreement for most organs (ICC ≥ 74%), except for lymph nodes (ICC ≥ 53%).

CONCLUSION:

SSTR-RADS 1.0 represents a highly reproducible and consistent framework system for stratifying SSTR-targeted PET/CT scans, even using the novel SSTR-ligand [18F]SiTATE. Some inter-reader variability was observed regarding the evaluation of uptake intensity prior to PRRT as well as compartment scoring of lymph nodes, indicating that those categories require special attention during further clinical validation and might be refined in a future SSTR-RADS version 1.1. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT SSTR-RADS 1.0 is a consistent framework for categorizing somatostatin receptor-targeted PET/CT scans when using [18F]SiTATE. The framework serves as a valuable tool for facilitating and improving the management of patients with NET. KEY POINTS SSTR-RADS 1.0 is a valuable tool for managing patients with NET. SSTR-RADS 1.0 categorizes patients with showing strong agreement across diverse reader expertise. As an alternative to [68Ga]-labeled PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor imaging, SSTR-RADS 1.0 reliably classifies [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article