Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantitative analysis from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI using population-based versus individual arterial input functions, and comparison with semi-quantitative analysis.
Xie, Tianwen; Zhao, Qiufeng; Fu, Caixia; Grimm, Robert; Dominik Nickel, Marcel; Hu, Xiaoxin; Yue, Lei; Peng, Weijun; Gu, Yajia.
Afiliação
  • Xie T; Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhao Q; Department of Radiology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Fu C; MR Applications Development, Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
  • Grimm R; MR Application Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Dominik Nickel M; MR Application Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Hu X; Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
  • Yue L; Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
  • Peng W; Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: pengweijun2017@163.com.
  • Gu Y; Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: guyajia@126.com.
Eur J Radiol ; 176: 111501, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38788607
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the value of inline quantitative analysis of ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) using a population-based arterial input function (P-AIF) compared with offline quantitative analysis with an individual AIF (I-AIF) and semi-quantitative analysis for diagnosing breast cancer.

METHODS:

This prospective study included 99 consecutive patients with 109 lesions (85 malignant and 24 benign). Model-based parameters (Ktrans, kep, and ve) and model-free parameters (washin and washout) were derived from CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE (CDTV) DCE-MRI. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis with forward stepwise covariate selection were performed to identify significant variables. The AUC and F1 score were assessed for semi-quantitative and two quantitative analyses.

RESULTS:

kep from inline quantitative analysis with P-AIF for diagnosing breast cancer provided an AUC similar to kep from offline quantitative analysis with I-AIF (0.782 vs 0.779, p = 0.954), higher compared to washin from semi-quantitative analysis (0.782 vs 0.630, p = 0.034). Furthermore, the inline quantitative analysis with P-AIF achieved the larger F1 score (0.920) compared with offline quantitative analysis with I-AIF (0.780) and semi-quantitative analysis (0.480). There were no statistically significant differences for kep values between the two quantitative analysis schemes (p = 0.944).

CONCLUSION:

The inline quantitative analysis with P-AIF from CDTV in characterizing breast lesions could offer similar diagnostic accuracy to offline quantitative analysis with I-AIF, and higher diagnostic accuracy to semi-quantitative analysis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Meios de Contraste Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Meios de Contraste Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article