Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of a 3D Printed Silicone Oral Cavity Cancer Model for Surgical Simulations.
Eu, Donovan; Daly, Michael J; Taboni, Stefano; Sahovaler, Axel; Gilbank, Ashley N; Irish, Jonathan C.
Afiliação
  • Eu D; Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
  • Daly MJ; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery-Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.
  • Taboni S; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health Systems, Singapore 119228, Singapore.
  • Sahovaler A; Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
  • Gilbank AN; Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
  • Irish JC; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery-Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.
J Pers Med ; 14(5)2024 Apr 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793031
ABSTRACT
Adequate surgical margins are essential in oral cancer treatment, this is, however, difficult to appreciate during training. With advances in training aids, we propose a silicone-based surgical simulator to improve training proficiency for the ablation of oral cavity cancers. A silicone-based tongue cancer model constructed via a 3D mold was compared to a porcine tongue model used as a training model. Participants of varying surgical experience were then asked to resect the tumors with clear margins, and thereafter asked to fill out a questionnaire to evaluate the face and content validity of the models as a training tool. Eleven participants from the Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery unit were included in this pilot study. In comparison to the porcine model, the silicone model attained a higher face (4 vs. 3.6) and content validity (4.4 vs. 4.1). Tumor consistency was far superior in the silicone model compared to the porcine model (4.1 vs. 2.8, p = 0.0042). Fellows and staff demonstrated a better margin clearance compared to residents (median 3.5 mm vs. 1.0 mm), and unlike the resident group, there was no incidence of positive margins. The surgical simulation was overall useful for trainees to appreciate the nature of margin clearance in oral cavity cancer ablation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article