Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of infused red blood cell volume on major and bidirectional ABO-mismatched bone marrow transplantation.
Araújo, Anelise Bergmann; Schmalfuss, Tissiana; Furlan, Juliana Monteiro; Speransa, Daniela; Angeli, Melissa Helena; Sekine, Leo; Franz, Juliana Pires Marafon.
Afiliação
  • Araújo AB; Centro de Processamento Celular, Serviço de Hemoterapia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil; Laboratório de Células, Tecidos e Genes, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Electronic address: abaraujo@hcpa.edu.br.
  • Schmalfuss T; Centro de Processamento Celular, Serviço de Hemoterapia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Furlan JM; Centro de Processamento Celular, Serviço de Hemoterapia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Speransa D; Unidade de Terapia Transfusional, Serviço de Hemoterapia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Angeli MH; Centro de Processamento Celular, Serviço de Hemoterapia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Sekine L; Serviço de Hemoterapia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Franz JPM; Unidade de Terapia Transfusional, Serviço de Hemoterapia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Cytotherapy ; 2024 May 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795114
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND

AIMS:

ABO incompatibility does not hinder bone marrow transplantation (BMT), but it has been associated with worse outcomes and additional adverse events. This study aimed to verify the impact of incompatible red blood cells (iRBCs) in allogeneic BMT and to determine a safe number of iRBCs to be infused.

METHODS:

We compared ABO-incompatible (iABO) allogeneic BMT (n = 42) with ABO-compatible allogeneic BMT (n = 44) and evaluated the impact of the number of infused iRBCs on outcomes and adverse events.

RESULTS:

The iABO patients demonstrated delayed time to transfusion independence at 30 days and 60 days, increased requirement for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and greater hemolysis signals and incidence of pure red cell aplasia. Neutrophil/platelet engraftment, length of hospitalization post-transplant, platelet units required, graft-versus-host disease occurrence and overall survival were similar in both groups. Patients in the iABO group received 1.03 × 1010 iRBCs/kg (range, 0.36-3.88). Infusion of iRBCs >1.0 × 1010 /kg was related to graft failure or death before neutrophil engraftment or platelet engraftment or both as well as increased plasma requirement and increased creatinine. Our results also suggest that antibody titers impact the transplantation scenario.

CONCLUSIONS:

The iABO transplantation showed some unfavorable outcomes. It is important to monitor the value of iRBCs to be infused, considering the recipient antibody titers. We propose using the number of iRBCs (iRBCs/kg) as a dose parameter with regard to infused iRBCs. Further studies are necessary to clarify the maximum safe number of iRBCs in iABO transplants.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article