Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ß-Lactam allergy delabeling is safe and saves costs in Primary Care.
Quiralte, Joaquín; Del Robledo Ávila, María; Domínguez, Isabel; Menéndez, Estela; Cisneros, José Miguel; Guisado, Ana Belén.
Afiliação
  • Quiralte J; Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain. Electronic address: joaquinquiralte@gmail.com.
  • Del Robledo Ávila M; Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
  • Domínguez I; Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
  • Menéndez E; Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
  • Cisneros JM; Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
  • Guisado AB; Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
Aten Primaria ; 56(11): 102925, 2024 May 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795675
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether the ß-lactam allergy delabeling was safe and cost-saving in Primary Care (PC) patients.

DESIGN:

We have conducted a retrospective chart review of PC patients with ß-lactam allergy label evaluated in our Allergy Unit between 2017 and 2022. SITE Allergy Department. Hospital Virgen del Rocio (Sevilla).

PARTICIPANTS:

A total of 391 patients labeled for ß-lactam allergy in PC were studied. MAIN MEASUREMENTS (a) Outcome evaluation of a ß-lactam allergy delabeling procedure. (b) A ratio between the total e-prescribed antibiotic cost and the number of treatment days (the experimental daily antibiotic cost or EDAC) before and after delabeling was analyzed in delabeled and truly allergic patients.

RESULTS:

The results of skin testing were positive in 9.2% of the reported cases (36 of 391 patients). The reactions to oral provocation challenge (OPC) occurred in 2.14% of the patients who underwent negative skin testing to offending ß-lactam (in 15 of 699 OPC). A total of 307 patients (78.5%) were delabeled; 70 (17.9%) had a ß-lactam selective response and 14 (3.59%) reacted to both penicillin and cephalosporin. The EDAC before and after the procedure in delabeled patients was significantly lower (0.88 € vs 0.62 €, p<10-3), than that observed in truly allergic group (0.87 € vs. 0.76 €, p=not significant).

CONCLUSION:

To delabel ß-lactam allergy in Primary Care patients is safe in most patients, cost-saving in antibioticotherapy, and allows identify the main clinical ß-lactam allergy phenotypes that benefit from this procedure.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article