Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hemodiafiltration versus Hemodialysis in End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Guimarães, Maria Gabriela Motta; Tapioca, Fernanda Pinheiro Martin; Dos Santos, Naiara Rodrigues; Tourinho Ferreira, Fernanda Pitta do Carmo; Santana Passos, Luiz Carlos; Rocha, Paulo Novis.
Afiliação
  • Guimarães MGM; Nephrology Department, Ana Nery Hospital, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
  • Tapioca FPM; Nephrology Department, Ana Nery Hospital, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
  • Dos Santos NR; Bahiana School of Medicine, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
  • Tourinho Ferreira FPDC; Medicine and Health Post Graduate Program, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
  • Santana Passos LC; Nephrology Department, Ana Nery Hospital, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
  • Rocha PN; Nephrology Department, Ana Nery Hospital, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Kidney Med ; 6(6): 100829, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38799785
ABSTRACT
Rationale &

Objective:

The use of hemodiafiltration (HDF) as a kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) has sparked a debate regarding its advantages over conventional hemodialysis (HD). The present study aims to shed light on this controversy by comparing mortality rates and cause-specific deaths between ESKD patients receiving HDF and those undergoing HD. Study

Design:

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central on July 1, 2023. Setting &

Participants:

Adult patients with ESKD on regular KRT. Exposure Studies with participants undergoing HDF.

Outcomes:

Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, deaths related to infections, and kidney transplant. We also evaluated the endpoints for deaths related to malignancy, myocardial infarction, stroke, arrhythmias, and sudden death. Analytical

Approach:

We included RCTs evaluating HDF versus HD. Crossover trials and studies with overlapping populations were excluded. Two authors independently extracted the data following predefined search criteria and quality assessment. The risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane's RoB2 tool.

Results:

We included 5 RCTs with 4,143 patients, of which 2,078 (50.1%) underwent HDF, whereas 2,065 (49.8%) were receiving HD. Overall, HDF was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.91; P < 0.001; I2 = 7%) and a lower risk of CV-related deaths (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92; P = 0.007; I2 = 0%). The incidence of infection-related deaths was also significantly different between therapies (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.95; P = 0.02; I2 = 26%).

Limitations:

In individual studies, the HDF groups achieved varying levels of convection volume.

Conclusions:

Compared with those undergoing HD, patients receiving HDF experienced a reduction in all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and infection-related mortality. These results provide compelling evidence supporting the use of HDF as a beneficial intervention in ESKD patients undergoing KRT. Registration Registered at PROSPERO CRD42023438362.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article