Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determination of interaction parameters in a bottom-up approach employed in reactive dissipative particle dynamics simulations for thermosetting polymers.
Li, Kaiwen; Kikugawa, Gota; Kawagoe, Yoshiaki; Zhao, Yinbo; Okabe, Tomonaga.
Afiliação
  • Li K; Department of Finemechanics, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan.
  • Kikugawa G; Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan. kikugawa@tohoku.ac.jp.
  • Kawagoe Y; Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan. kikugawa@tohoku.ac.jp.
  • Zhao Y; Department of Aerospace Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, 6-6-01, Aramaki Aza Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8597, Japan.
  • Okabe T; School of Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, PR China.
Soft Matter ; 20(23): 4591-4607, 2024 Jun 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38805009
ABSTRACT
The limitations in previous dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) studies confined simulations to a narrow resin range. This study refines DPD parameter calculation methodology, extending its application to diverse polymer materials. Using a bottom-up approach with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we evaluated solubility parameters and bead number density governing nonbonded interactions via the Flory-Huggins parameter and covalent-bonded interactions. Two solubility parameter methods, Hildebrand and Krevelen-Hoftyzer, were compared for DPD simulations. The Hildebrand method, utilizing MD simulations, demonstrates higher consistency and broader applicability in determining solubility parameters for all DPD particles. The DPD/MD curing reaction process was examined in three epoxy systems DGEBA/4,4'-DDS, DGEBA/MPDA and DGEBA/DETA. Calculations for the curing profile, gelation point, radial distribution function and branch ratio were performed. Compared to MD data for DGEBA/4,4'-DDS, the maximum deviation in secondary reactions between epoxy and amine groups according to DPD simulations with Krevelen-Hoftyzer was 14.8%, while with the Hildebrand method, it was 1.7%. The accuracy of the DPD curing reaction in reproducing the structural properties verifies its expanded application to general polymeric material simulations. The proposed curing DPD simulations, with a short run time and minimal computational resources, contributes to high-throughput screening for optimal resins and investigates mesoscopic inhomogeneous structures in large resin systems.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article