Perilunate Dislocations: Cadaveric Model K-Wire Versus Compression Staple Fixation.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Repair of perilunate dislocations requires stabilization of the carpal bones, although there is limited research on the preferred method(s) of stabilization. We compared the biomechanical characteristics of K-wire versus staple fixation of scapholunate (SL) and lunotriquetral (LT) intervals in the wrist. Methods: After creating a grade IV instability model, 20 cadaver wrists were randomized into 2 stabilization model groups using K-wires or surgical staples across the SL and LT intervals. For each ligament, two K-wires or one surgical staple was used to stabilize the proximal carpal row. Each wrist was loaded with 15 N of force and cycled 5,000 times at an angular velocity of 10 rpm. Displacement between bones was measured at different cycles (10, 100, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, and 5,000). A t test was used for comparisons. Results: For the LT K-wire group, the average displacement at 10 cycles was 0.08 mm, and at 5,000 cycles, 0.163 mm. For the SL K-wire group, the average displacement at 10 cycles was 0.025 mm, and at 5,000 cycles, 0.129 mm. For the LT and SL staple fixation models, the average shifts at 10 cycles were 0.029 and 0.063 mm, and at 5,000 cycles, 0.098 and 0.176 mm, respectively. No significant difference between the fixation models was found at any interval. Notably, in each group, a similar number of small outliers with higher amounts of displacement was observed. Conclusions: Either K-wire or surgical staple stabilization is suitable for perilunate dislocations. The surgical method should be selected based on patient-specific circumstances and the provider's judgment. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III.