Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A survey of foot disinfection practices for control of bovine digital dermatitis; evaluating solution depth, footbath hygiene, and the potential of footbaths as infection reservoirs for Treponema species.
Gillespie, Amy; Vanhoudt, Arne; Benedictus, Lindert; McAloon, Conor G; Logan, Finnian; Spaninks, Mirlin; Viora, Lorenzo.
Afiliação
  • Gillespie A; Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: amyg@liverpool.ac.uk.
  • Vanhoudt A; Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; *Current affiliation Royal GD, Deventer, the Netherlands.
  • Benedictus L; Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; *Current affiliation Royal GD, Deventer, the Netherlands.
  • McAloon CG; School of Veterinary medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland.
  • Logan F; School of Veterinary medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland.
  • Spaninks M; Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; *Current affiliation Royal GD, Deventer, the Netherlands.
  • Viora L; School of Biodiversity, One health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
J Dairy Sci ; 2024 May 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825105
ABSTRACT
Bovine digital dermatitis remains a widespread endemic disease of dairy cattle worldwide. Footbathing is commonly used as a control measure and has significant economic and environmental impact. There are few studies documenting footbathing practices on dairy farms, or evaluating their suitability for achieving foot disinfection. This study describes footbathing practices on 32 farms observed in the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the Netherlands. We measured solution depth throughout footbathing and observed levels below 7cm on 9/32 farms, which leads to inadequate foot coverage. Solution depth was associated with the number of cow passages, decreasing by 1.2cm for every 100 cow passages. We also describe levels of organic matter content (g/L) throughout footbathing as a proxy for footbath hygiene. Our data indicates that almost half of footbaths (15/32) became contaminated above the 20g/L threshold to which veterinary biocides are tested for efficacy, and that organic matter content is associated with the number of cow passages per liter of footbathing solution provided. A multivariable mixed model predicted that one liter of footbathing solution per cow should be sufficient to prevent excess contamination. As a further measure of hygiene, we tested a subset of footbath samples to quantify the amount of DNA present from the Treponema species which are considered instrumental in the etiology of digital dermatitis. We did not detect Treponema DNA in footbath samples, suggesting they are unlikely to act as infection reservoirs for this disease. Multivariable mixed models including farm identity as a random effect demonstrated that for both change in solution depth and organic matter content the effect of farm-level factors was large. Because of the magnitude of this farm effect, applying model predictions will not translate to adequate solution depth and hygiene on all farms. Our data highlights the importance of footbath auditing on individual farms.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article