Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A guide to interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery and surgery.
Esene, Ignatius; Tantengco, Ourlad Alzeus G; Robertson, Faith C; Still, Megan E H; Ukachukwu, Alvan-Emeka K; Baticulon, Ronnie E; Barthélemy, Ernest J; Perez-Chadid, Daniela; Lippa, Laura; Silva, Ana Cristina Veiga; Jokonya, Luxwell; Hassani, Fahd D; Nicolosi, Federico; Takoutsing, Berjo D; Ntalaja, Jeff; Hoz, Samer S; Kalangu, Kazadi K N; Dechambenoit, Gilbert; Servadei, Franco; El Abbadi, Najia; Park, Kee B; Kolias, Angelos.
Afiliação
  • Esene I; Neurosurgery Division, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bamenda, Bambili, Cameroon. ignatiusesene@yahoo.co.uk.
  • Tantengco OAG; Research Division, Winners Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon. ignatiusesene@yahoo.co.uk.
  • Robertson FC; Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
  • Still MEH; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Ukachukwu AK; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Baticulon RE; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Barthélemy EJ; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
  • Perez-Chadid D; Global Neurosurgery Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
  • Lippa L; Faculty of Medicine, Universidad CES, Medellin, Colombia.
  • Silva ACV; Department of Neurosurgery, ASST Ospedale Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
  • Jokonya L; Neurosurgery Department of Post Graduation Program in Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (PosNeuro), Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
  • Hassani FD; Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • Nicolosi F; Department of Neurosurgery, Cheikh Zaid International Hospital, Abulcasis International University of Health Sciences, Rabat, Morocco.
  • Takoutsing BD; Department of Medicine and Surgery, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
  • Ntalaja J; Research Division, Winners Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
  • Hoz SS; Clinique Ngaliema, République Démocratique du Congo, Kinshasa, Congo.
  • Kalangu KKN; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Dechambenoit G; Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • Servadei F; Centre Medical Chirurgical Obstetrical Cote d'Opale, Saint Martin Boulogne, France.
  • El Abbadi N; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
  • Park KB; Department of Neurosurgery, Cheikh Zaid International Hospital, Abulcasis International University of Health Sciences, Rabat, Morocco.
  • Kolias A; Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 166(1): 250, 2024 Jun 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833024
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) are methods of data analysis used to synthesize information presented in multiple publications on the same topic. A thorough understanding of the steps involved in conducting this type of research and approaches to data analysis is critical for appropriate understanding, interpretation, and application of the findings of these reviews.

METHODS:

We reviewed reference texts in clinical neuroepidemiology, neurostatistics and research methods and other previously related articles on meta-analyses (MAs) in surgery. Based on existing theories and models and our cumulative years of expertise in conducting MAs, we have synthesized and presented a detailed pragmatic approach to interpreting MAs in Neurosurgery.

RESULTS:

Herein we have briefly defined SRs sand MAs and related terminologies, succinctly outlined the essential steps to conduct and critically appraise SRs and MAs. A practical approach to interpreting MAs for neurosurgeons is described in details. Based on summary outcome measures, we have used hypothetical examples to illustrate the Interpretation of the three commonest types of MAs in neurosurgery MAs of Binary Outcome Measures (Pairwise MAs), MAs of proportions and MAs of Continuous Variables. Furthermore, we have elucidated on the concepts of heterogeneity, modeling, certainty, and bias essential for the robust and transparent interpretation of MAs. The basics for the Interpretation of Forest plots, the preferred graphical display of data in MAs are summarized. Additionally, a condensation of the assessment of the overall quality of methodology and reporting of MA and the applicability of evidence to patient care is presented.

CONCLUSION:

There is a paucity of pragmatic guides to appraise MAs for surgeons who are non-statisticians. This article serves as a detailed guide for the interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses with examples of applications for clinical neurosurgeons.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Metanálise como Assunto / Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos / Neurocirurgia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Metanálise como Assunto / Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos / Neurocirurgia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article