Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Insertion site and risk of peripheral intravenous catheter colonization and/or local infection: a post hoc analysis of the CLEAN 3 study including more than 800 catheters.
Drugeon, Bertrand; Marjanovic, Nicolas; Boisson, Matthieu; Buetti, Niccolò; Mimoz, Olivier; Guenezan, Jérémy.
Afiliação
  • Drugeon B; CHU de Poitiers, Service des Urgences Adultes -SAMU, 86-Centre 15-2, Rue de La Milétrie, Poitiers, Cedex, 86021, France.
  • Marjanovic N; INSERM, U1070, Pharmacologie Des Agents Antimicrobiens Et Antibio-Résistances, Poitiers, France.
  • Boisson M; Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Buetti N; CHU de Poitiers, Service des Urgences Adultes -SAMU, 86-Centre 15-2, Rue de La Milétrie, Poitiers, Cedex, 86021, France.
  • Mimoz O; INSERM CIC1402, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
  • Guenezan J; INSERM, U1070, Pharmacologie Des Agents Antimicrobiens Et Antibio-Résistances, Poitiers, France.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 57, 2024 Jun 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38840171
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Although uncommon, infections associated with peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) may be responsible for severe life-threatening complications and increase healthcare costs. Few data are available on the relationship between PIVC insertion site and risk of infectious complications.

METHODS:

We performed a post hoc analysis of the CLEAN 3 database, a randomized 2 × 2 factorial study comparing two skin disinfection procedures (2% chlorhexidine-alcohol or 5% povidone iodine-alcohol) and two types of medical devices (innovative or standard) in 989 adults patients requiring PIVC insertion before admission to a medical ward. Insertion sites were grouped into five areas hand, wrist, forearm, cubital fossa and upper arm. We evaluated the risk of risk of PIVC colonization (i.e., tip culture eluate in broth showing at least one microorganism in a concentration of at least 1000 Colony Forming Units per mL) and/or local infection (i.e., organisms growing from purulent discharge at PIVC insertion site with no evidence of associated bloodstream infection), and the risk of positive PIVC tip culture (i.e., PIVC-tip culture eluate in broth showing at least one microorganism regardless of its amount) using multivariate Cox models.

RESULTS:

Eight hundred twenty three PIVCs with known insertion site and sent to the laboratory for quantitative culture were included. After adjustment for confounding factors, PIVC insertion at the cubital fossa or wrist was associated with increased risk of PIVC colonization and/or local infection (HR [95% CI], 1.64 [0.92-2.93] and 2.11 [1.08-4.13]) and of positive PIVC tip culture (HR [95% CI], 1.49 [1.02-2.18] and 1.59 [0.98-2.59]).

CONCLUSION:

PIVC insertion at the wrist or cubital fossa should be avoided whenever possible to reduce the risk of catheter colonization and/or local infection and of positive PIVC tip culture.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo Periférico / Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cateterismo Periférico / Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article