Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab and Subsequent Therapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Age-Stratified Analysis.
Vassilev, Zdravko P; Fan, Xiaozhou; Xu, Julie; Ostojic, Helene; Barzi, Afsaneh.
Afiliação
  • Vassilev ZP; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ. Electronic address: zdravko.vassilev@bayer.com.
  • Fan X; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ.
  • Xu J; Bayer Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ostojic H; Bayer Consumer Care, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Barzi A; Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38853099
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Treatment recommendations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) do not differ by age group; nevertheless, aggressive multiagent chemotherapy comprising FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab (triplet+bev) is routinely administered in younger patients. This study analyzed real-world data on index triplet+bev use and subsequent systemic therapies. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in patients aged ≥ 18 years with mCRC, who were initiated on triplet+bev. Data were derived from the Optum de-identified electronic health record dataset.

RESULTS:

Of 36,056 patients, 14%, 36%, and 50% were aged 18-49, 50-64, and ≥ 65 years, respectively. During the study period (2010-2021), triplet+bev use increased in patients aged 18-49 years (1%-4%) but remained at approximately 3% and 1% in patients aged 50-64 and ≥ 65 years, respectively. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics varied slightly; of patients receiving triplet+bev (n = 921) versus nontriplet+bev (n = 35,132) most were male (57% vs. 52%), resided in the Midwest (54% vs. 49%) and Northeast (18% vs. 14%) US regions, and had secondary malignancies (86% vs. 73%). Following triplet+bev, most patients received subsequent therapies (including continued triplet component therapies; 97%) or subsequent "new" therapies (therapies that did not include any agents comprising triplet+bev; 57%), most frequently EGFR inhibitors (28%) and regorafenib (21%), with a similar trend among all age groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, this study shows that younger patients with mCRC are more likely to receive first-line triplet+bev. These results also reveal that nonchemotherapy options are often used beyond first-line triplet chemotherapy for patients with mCRC.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article