Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department: Training, Perceptions, Applications, and Barriers from Different Healthcare Professionals.
Healy, Jack; Tzeng, Ching-Fang Tiffany; Wolfshohl, Jon; Shedd, Andrew; Lin, Judy; Patel, Chinmay; Chou, Eric H.
Afiliação
  • Healy J; Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine Fort Worth USA.
  • Tzeng CT; Texas Christian University Burnett School of Medicine Fort Worth USA.
  • Wolfshohl J; Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine Fort Worth USA.
  • Shedd A; Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine Fort Worth USA.
  • Lin J; Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine Fort Worth USA.
  • Patel C; Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine Fort Worth USA.
  • Chou EH; Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine Fort Worth USA.
J Acute Med ; 14(2): 74-89, 2024 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38859928
ABSTRACT

Background:

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable tool that assists in diagnosis and management of patients in the emergency department (ED) while being cost-efficient and without the use of ionizing radiation. To discern the opinions and perceptions of ED staff about POCUS applications and barriers, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of employees of 12 EDs in North Texas.

Methods:

Participants completed a 20-item online survey about POCUS with questions pertaining to four domains (1) employee and training information, (2) perceived benefits, (3) common applications, and (4) barriers to use. Out of 805 eligible ED employees, 103 completed the survey (16.1% response rate).

Results:

The results indicated a generally positive perception of POCUS among all employee types. Physician had significant exposure and training of POCUS than non-physician group ( p < 0.001). Physicians tend to find cardiac assessments more useful for clinical management than non-physicians (47% vs. 23%, p = 0.01), while non-physicians find soft tissue/abscess assessments more useful (27% vs. 9%, p = 0.01).

Conclusion:

The most significant barriers to POCUS use were time constraints for physicians and a lack of training for non-physician employees. Our study provides valuable insights into the perceptions of multiple ED professionals, serving as a foundation for promoting POCUS use in the ED.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article