Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Waste to protein: A systematic review of a century of advancement in microbial fermentation of agro-industrial byproducts.
Nadar, Cresha Gracy; Fletcher, Andrew; Moreira, Bruno Rafael de Almeida; Hine, Damian; Yadav, Sudhir.
Afiliação
  • Nadar CG; Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
  • Fletcher A; Fonterra Research and Development Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
  • Moreira BRA; Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
  • Hine D; Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
  • Yadav S; Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf ; 23(4): e13375, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865211
ABSTRACT
Increasing global consumption of protein over the last five decades, coupled with concerns about the impact on emissions of animal-based protein production, has created interest in alternative protein sources. Microbial proteins (MPs), derived through the fermentation of agro-industrial byproducts, present a promising option. This review assesses a century of advancements in this domain. We conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis, examining 347 relevant research papers to identify trends, technological advancements, and key influencing factors in the production of MP. The analysis covered the types of feedstocks and microbes, fermentation methods, and the implications of nucleic acid content on the food-grade quality of proteins. A conditional inference tree model and Bayesian factor were used to ascertain the impact of various parameters on protein content. Out of all the studied parameters, such as type of feedstock (lignocellulose, free sugars, gases, and others), type of fermentation (solid, liquid, gas), type of microbe (bacteria, fungi, yeast, and mix), and operating parameters (temperature, time, and pH), the type of fermentation and microbe were identified as the largest influences on protein content. Gas and liquid fermentation demonstrated higher protein content, averaging 52% and 42%, respectively. Among microbes, bacterial species produced a higher protein content of 51%. The suitable operating parameters, such as pH, time, and temperature, were also identified for different microbes. The results point to opportunities for continued innovation in feedstock, microbes, and regulatory alignment to fully realize the potential of MP in contributing to global food security and sustainability goals.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fermentação Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fermentação Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article