Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What does the Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment-II (NEPSY-II) measure in children ages 7 to 12? A structural and psychometric analysis.
Singh, Leah J; Floyd, Randy G; Reynolds, Matthew R; Pike, Nikita M; Huenergarde, Morgan C.
Afiliação
  • Singh LJ; Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
  • Floyd RG; Department of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
  • Reynolds MR; Department of Educational Psychology, The University of Kansas, Kansas, MO, USA.
  • Pike NM; Department of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
  • Huenergarde MC; Department of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Child Neuropsychol ; : 1-32, 2024 Jun 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38873994
ABSTRACT
The Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment - II (NEPSY-II) is a widely used assessment battery in pediatric settings, but its internal structure has not been adequately examined. This study employed a rational, empirical approach to examine the construct validity of 23 NEPSY-II subtest scores from children ages 7-12 (M = 9.99, SD = 2.76) in the NEPSY-II norming sample (N = 600; 50% girls). Competing higher-order models based on prior research, hypothesized NEPSY-II domains, and conceptual subtest classifications were evaluated via confirmatory factor analysis and a sequential approach to model comparisons. The results supported the multidimensionality of NEPSY-II subtests and the organization of subtests by hypothesized neuropsychological domains. The best fitting model included a general factor and four first-order factors. Factor loadings from the general factor to first-order factors were very strong. However, general factor loadings for most subtests were less than .50 (range = .21-.69, M = .44), and domain-specific effects for all subtests, independent of the general factor, were even lower (range = .00-.45, M = .44). Interestingly, all subtests demonstrated strong subtest-specific effects, but it is not clear what construct(s) the subtest-specific effects represent. Findings support NEPSY-II authors' emphasis on subtest-level interpretations rather than composite-level interpretations and highlight that NEPSY-II subtest scores should be interpreted carefully and with caution.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article