Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sticking to the script: Breast cancer patients' decision making regarding oral endocrine therapy.
Wheeler, Stephanie B; Roberts, Megan C; Waters, Austin R; Bloom, Diane; Peppercorn, Jeffrey; Golin, Carol; Reeder-Hayes, Katherine E.
Afiliação
  • Wheeler SB; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: stephanie_wheeler@unc.edu.
  • Roberts MC; Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Waters AR; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Bloom D; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Peppercorn J; Dana Farber Cancer Center, Harvard University, MA, USA.
  • Golin C; Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Reeder-Hayes KE; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Patient Educ Couns ; 127: 108349, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38878585
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We sought to understand why some women with early-stage breast cancer decide to forgo or discontinue endocrine therapy (ET), and to identify factors that might lead to greater acceptance of, and long-term adherence to, this treatment.

METHODS:

We conducted in-depth interviews with N = 53 stage I-III HR+ women who were either non-initiators of ET, initiators who discontinued or initiators who continued with variable daily patterns of adherence. An inductive content analysis was performed to explore the decision-making process of women prescribed ET.

RESULTS:

Qualitative analyses revealed 55 themes that drove complex decision making. The initiators generally trusted their physicians and did little research before starting the medication. Non-initiators were more suspicious of the medical system, believing that ET presented more risks than benefits. Most discontinuers stopped ET because of side effects. Both non-initiators and discontinuers indicated that push-back from their physicians could have changed their decision. Stories and social support were important in decision making.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although ET can significantly reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrence, substantial barriers prevent many women from initiating or continuing it. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Physicians have powerful influence over patients' decisions to initiate ET and can be important levers for motivating patients to persist.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Relações Médico-Paciente / Neoplasias da Mama / Entrevistas como Assunto / Antineoplásicos Hormonais / Tomada de Decisões / Pesquisa Qualitativa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Relações Médico-Paciente / Neoplasias da Mama / Entrevistas como Assunto / Antineoplásicos Hormonais / Tomada de Decisões / Pesquisa Qualitativa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article