Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Imaging differentiation of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms and neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas.
Khristenko, Ekaterina; Gaida, Matthias M; Tjaden, Christine; Steinle, Verena; Loos, Martin; Krieger, Korbinian; Weber, Tim F; Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich; Klauß, Miriam; Mayer, Philipp.
Afiliação
  • Khristenko E; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
  • Gaida MM; Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mainz, JGU-Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany.
  • Tjaden C; Joint Unit Immunopathology, Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center, JGU-Mainz and TRON, Translational Oncology at the University Medical Center, JGU-Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany.
  • Steinle V; Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
  • Loos M; Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
  • Krieger K; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
  • Weber TF; Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
  • Kauczor HU; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
  • Klauß M; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland.
  • Mayer P; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Eur J Radiol Open ; 12: 100576, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38882634
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The present study aimed to compare the computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs).

Method:

Lesion imaging features of 39 patients with SPNs and 127 patients with pNENs were retrospectively extracted from 104 CT and 91 MRI scans.

Results:

Compared to pNEN patients, SPN patients were significantly younger (mean age 51.8 yrs versus 32.7 yrs) and more often female (female male ratio, 5.501 versus 1.191). Most SPNs and pNENs presented as well-defined lesions with an expansive growth pattern. SPNs more often appeared as round or ovoid lesions, compared to pNENs which showed a lobulated or irregular shape in more than half of cases (p<0.01). A surrounding capsule was detected in the majority of SPNs, but only in a minority of pNENs (<0.01). Hemorrhage occurred non-significantly more often in SPNs (p=0.09). Signal inhomogeneity in T1-fat-saturated (p<0.01) and T2-weighted imaging (p=0.046) as well as cystic degeneration (p<0.01) were more often observed in SPNs. Hyperenhancement in the arterial and portal-venous phase was more common in pNENs (p<0.01). Enlargement of locoregional lymph nodes (p<0.01) and liver metastases (p=0.03) were observed in some pNEN patients, but not in SPN patients. Multivariate logistic regression identified the presence of a capsule (p<0.01), absence of arterial hyperenhancement (p<0.01), and low patient age (p<0.01), as independent predictors for SPN.

Conclusions:

The present study provides three key features for differentiating SPNs from pNENs extracted from a large patient cohort presence of a capsule, absence of arterial hyperenhancement, and low patient age.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article