[Vascularsurgical Long-term Outcome - Comparison of Orthotopic and Extraanatomic Reconstructions in Unilateral Occlusions of Iliac Artery over 10 Years]. / Gefäßchirurgische Langzeitergebnisse ­ Vergleich orthotoper und extraanatomischer Rekonstruktionen bei unilateralen Beckenachsenverschlüssen über 10 Jahre.

ABSTRACT

In PAOD, several vascular regions are usually affected, the pelvic axis in 35% of cases. Interventional-radiological/endovascular or hybrid interventions have been established for recanalization, so that bypass procedures are increasingly taking a back seat, but are not losing their importance.To study unilateral iliac artery occlusions (inclusion criterion) that were repaired either by implantation of an orthotopic or extraanatomic bypass (oBP/eaBP).Over a defined period of time, the rate of open vessel, complications (frequency, type, severity) to characterize morbidity and mortality as well as the extent of clinical improvement after BP implantation were analyzed in a clinical-systematic, single-center observational study (for vascular surgical quality assurance and contribution to vascular medical-clinical health care research). The study method was not explicitly based on the STROBE criteria, but essentially corresponds to them.Over 10 years, 122 PAOD patients (50% in stage IIb-stage III and IV equally distributed; mean age 63 [range, 44-87] years; majority ASA III) were included with the same number of reconstructions 71 patients received an eaBP ("crossover"), 51 patients an iliacofemoral (orthotopic - oBP) bypass (neither significant difference regarding frequency nor number of risk factors per patient).The oBP is not superior to eaBP with regard to the analysis parameters of openness, complication rate and mortality. Furthermore, extraanatomic revascularization does not have to be reserved for polymorbid patients only.