Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The efficacy of physeal bar resection with guided growth in the treatment of physeal arrest with angular limb deformity.
Alhassan, Mohammed Salman; Park, Kun Bo; Kim, Hyun Woo; Park, Hoon; Park, Kyeong Hyeon.
Afiliação
  • Alhassan MS; Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, King Faisal general Hospital, Hufuf, Saudi Arabia.
  • Park KB; Division of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
  • Kim HW; Division of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
  • Park H; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Park KH; Division of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea. ospkh@yuhs.ac.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 14052, 2024 06 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38890468
ABSTRACT
Premature physeal arrest can cause progressive deformities and functional disabilities of the lower limbs. This study addressed the outcomes after physeal bar resection with or without guided growth (temporary hemiepiphysiodesis) for the treatment of angular limb deformities. We retrospectively analyzed 27 patients (mean 9 years; range, 3-12 years) who underwent physeal bar resection of the distal femur (15 patients), proximal tibia (3 patients), and distal tibia (9 patients) between 2002 and 2020. Fifteen patients underwent physeal bar resection only (Group A), and the other twelve underwent simultaneous guided growth (Group B). The correction angle (angle change between the preoperative and last follow-up values) was compared and analyzed. The overall mean correction angle was 2.9° (range, - 9 to 18.3°). A total of 12 (45%) patients had a > 5° angular deformity improvement (mean, 9.6°; range, 5-18.3°), 9 (33%) had a < 5° angular change; and 6 (22%) had a > 5° worsening of the angular deformity (mean, 6.7°; range, 5.2-9°). The correction angle in Group B (mean 7.6° ± 6.2) was significantly higher than that in Group A (mean - 0.77° ± 6.3) (P = 0.01). We found six (40%) and zero patients with a > 5° angular deformity increase in Groups A and B, respectively (P < 0.047). The group that underwent physeal bar resection with guided growth showed significantly higher correction angles than the group that underwent physeal bar resection alone. Additionally, none of the patients in the guided growth group experienced an increased angular deformity. Therefore, combining guided growth with physeal bar resection may lead to better outcomes in the treatment of growth arrest with angular deformities.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tíbia / Fêmur Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tíbia / Fêmur Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article