Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival outcome of esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients >75 years of age.
Mayanagi, Shuhei; Inoue, Masazumi; Tokizawa, Kazunori; Fushiki, Kunihiro; Tsushima, Takahiro; Yokota, Tomoya; Yamazaki, Kentaro; Yasui, Hirofumi; Tsubosa, Yasuhiro.
Afiliação
  • Mayanagi S; Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Inoue M; Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Tokizawa K; Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Fushiki K; Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Tsushima T; Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Yokota T; Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Yamazaki K; Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Yasui H; Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Tsubosa Y; Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Thorac Cancer ; 15(21): 1656-1664, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38898742
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The gold standard for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is surgery-based treatment; however, it is unclear whether esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy is suitable for older patients. This retrospective study aimed to identify the treatment outcomes of surgery-based therapy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) as an initial treatment for older patients with resectable, locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS:

Data from 434 patients who received radical treatment for resectable, locally advanced ESCC were collected from January 2011 to December 2020. Of the patients >75 years of age, 49 underwent radical esophagectomy and 26 received dCRT. Survival was compared between the surgery and dCRT groups.

RESULTS:

The mean ages of the surgery and chemoradiotherapy groups were 77.3 and 78.8 years, respectively. Differences in overall survival (OS) between the two groups were not statistically significant (3-year OS surgery 66.2%, dCRT 55.7%, p = 0.236). Multivariate analysis for OS showed a hazard ratio of 1.229 for dCRT versus surgery (90% confidence interval 0.681-2.217). OS did not differ between the groups in any of the performance statuses. For patients who were able to receive chemotherapy using fluorouracil and cisplatin, OS tended to be better in the surgery group, but the difference was not statistically significant (3-year OS surgery 68.1%, dCRT 51.8%, p = 0.117).

CONCLUSIONS:

There was no clear difference in survival outcome between surgery-based therapy and dCRT as an initial treatment for esophageal cancer in older patients. Either treatment may be an option for older patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomia / Quimiorradioterapia / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomia / Quimiorradioterapia / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article