Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Re-treatment of bone metastases for pain control: 2023 ASTRO education panel.
Lee, Shing Fung; Simone, Charles B; Rades, Dirk; Wong, Henry C Y; Chow, Edward.
Afiliação
  • Lee SF; Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Simone CB; Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Rades D; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Wong HCY; Department of Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kowloon West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • Chow E; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ann Palliat Med ; 13(4): 1154-1160, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902990
ABSTRACT
Bone metastases are a common and debilitating consequence of advanced cancer, often necessitating palliative radiation therapy (RT) for pain relief. Reirradiation (reRT) of bone metastases is often considered after lack of pain relief following an initial course of RT, after a partial but unsatisfying pain response to an initial course of radiotherapy, or after pain recurrence following a complete or partial pain response to an initial course of RT. The NCIC CTG SC.20 trial, a landmark multicenter, randomized, non-blinded, controlled non-inferiority trial, addressed the critical question of optimal dose fractionation for reRT in this patient population. This trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of a single 8 Gy fraction to multiple fractions totaling 20 Gy in 850 patients with painful bone metastases requiring reRT. The primary endpoint was overall pain response at 2 months, with secondary endpoints of quality of life (QoL) measures, functional interference, and toxicity profiles assessed using patient-reported questionnaires and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30. The intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference in pain response between the two arms, meeting the pre-specified non-inferiority criteria. The per-protocol analysis suggested a potential benefit for a subset of patients receiving multiple fractions, although this was not statistically robust. Acute toxicities were more prevalent in the multiple fractions arm, with implications for patient comfort and healthcare utilization. Importantly, responders to reRT reported significant improvements in functional interference and QoL. The trial's findings support the use of a patient-centric approach to palliative RT, highlighting the viability of a single 8 Gy fraction as a less toxic and more convenient treatment option, albeit with consideration for individual patient circumstances. These results have significant implications for clinical practice, potentially reducing healthcare burdens while optimizing patient convenience during palliative care for painful bone metastases.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Neoplasias Ósseas / Manejo da Dor / Reirradiação / Dor do Câncer Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Neoplasias Ósseas / Manejo da Dor / Reirradiação / Dor do Câncer Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article