Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Accuracy and clinical efficacy of robot-assisted transiliac-transsacral screw placement for posterior pelvic ring fractures].
Wang, Xue-Lin; Wu, Zheng-Jie; Zeng, Yan-Hui; Li, Can-Hui; Zhou, Jian-Sheng; Hong, Shi.
Afiliação
  • Wang XL; The Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
  • Wu ZJ; Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
  • Zeng YH; Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
  • Li CH; Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhou JS; Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
  • Hong S; Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang ; 37(6): 6055-8, 2024 Jun 25.
Article em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38910384
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To explore accuracy and clinical effect of robot-assisted implantation of sacroiliac penetrating screw in orthopedic surgery for posterior pelvic ring fracture.

METHODS:

The clinical data of 24 patients with posterior pelvic ring fracture treated with robot-assisted sacroiliac penetration screws from August 2022 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 10 males and 14 females; aged from 21 to 73 years old with an average of (49.29±14.48) years old;according to Tile pelvic fractures, 13 patients were type B and 11 were type C. The effect of screw placement was evaluated according to Gras criteria based on postoperative CT scan results. At the final follow-up, fracture healing was evaluated according to Matta score, and functional recovery was evaluated by Majeed score.

RESULTS:

All patients were followed up for 3 to 13 months with an average of (6.00±3.28) months. Totally 36 sacroiliac penetrating screws, 18 S1 penetrating screws, 18 S2 penetrating screws were inserted, a total of 29 were excellent and 7 good according to Gras standard. Screw adjustment times was 0.00 (0.00, 0.75) times. At the final follow-up, Matta score was excellent in 18 patients, 5 good and 1 moderate, and the maximum displacement distance was 2.55 (0.00, 5.65) mm. Majeed score was 84.37±8.38, 15 patients were excellent, 7 good and 2 moderate.

CONCLUSION:

Robot could accurately and safely assist in the placement of sacroiliac joint screws for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring fractures, and promote postoperative functional recovery of patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ossos Pélvicos / Parafusos Ósseos / Fraturas Ósseas / Fixação Interna de Fraturas Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ossos Pélvicos / Parafusos Ósseos / Fraturas Ósseas / Fixação Interna de Fraturas Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article