Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatments in patients with resectable, borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
He, Jiaxin; Lv, Na; Yang, Zhenyi; Luo, Yixuan; Zhong, Wen; Wu, Chunli.
Afiliação
  • He J; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning, China.
Int J Surg ; 110(6): 3900-3909, 2024 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38935819
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim was to explore the optimal neoadjuvant therapy strategy for resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the development of new neoadjuvant treatment protocols for clinical use. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

The authors reviewed literature titles and abstracts comparing three treatment strategies (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and upfront surgery) in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science from 2009 to 2023 to estimate relative odds ratios for resection rate and hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) in all include trials.

RESULTS:

A total of nine studies involving 889 patients were included in the analysis. The treatment methods included upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. The network meta-analysis results demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery was an effective approach in improving OS for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) patients compared to upfront surgery (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.98) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.98). Additionally, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy significantly increased the margin negative resection (R0) rate and pathological negative lymph node (pN0) rate in patients with resectable and borderline RPC. However, it is worth noting that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy increased the risk of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events, including in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current evidence suggests that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is the optimal choice for treating patients with resectable and borderline RPC. Future research should focus on optimizing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens to effectively improve OS while reducing the occurrence of adverse events.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Metanálise em Rede Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Metanálise em Rede Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article