Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association between driving pressure-guided ventilation and postoperative pulmonary complications in surgical patients: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.
Gu, Wan-Jie; Cen, Yun; Zhao, Feng-Zhi; Wang, Hua-Jun; Yin, Hai-Yan; Zheng, Xiao-Fei.
Afiliação
  • Gu WJ; Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Cen Y; Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhao FZ; Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wang HJ; Department of Bone and Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Yin HY; Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: haiyanyin1867@126.com.
  • Zheng XF; Department of Bone and Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: zhengxiaofei12@163.com.
Br J Anaesth ; 133(3): 647-657, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937217
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prior studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the association between driving pressure-guided ventilation and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). We aimed to investigate whether driving pressure-guided ventilation is associated with a lower risk of PPCs.

METHODS:

We systematically searched electronic databases for RCTs comparing driving pressure-guided ventilation with conventional protective ventilation in adult surgical patients. The primary outcome was a composite of PPCs. Secondary outcomes were pneumonia, atelectasis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to assess the conclusiveness of evidence.

RESULTS:

Thirteen RCTs with 3401 subjects were included. Driving pressure-guided ventilation was associated with a lower risk of PPCs (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.87, P=0.001), as indicated by TSA. Subgroup analysis (P for interaction=0.04) found that the association was observed in non-cardiothoracic surgery (nine RCTs, 1038 subjects, RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.77, P< 0.0001), with TSA suggesting sufficient evidence and conclusive result; however, it did not reach significance in cardiothoracic surgery (four RCTs, 2363 subjects, RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67-1.10, P=0.23), with TSA indicating insufficient evidence and inconclusive result. Similarly, a lower risk of pneumonia was found in non-cardiothoracic surgery but not in cardiothoracic surgery (P for interaction=0.046). No significant differences were found in atelectasis and ARDS between the two ventilation strategies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Driving pressure-guided ventilation was associated with a lower risk of postoperative pulmonary complications in non-cardiothoracic surgery but not in cardiothoracic surgery. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL INPLASY 202410068.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article