Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electrochemical Generation of Hydroxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Hydrolysis of Sulfuryl Fluoride Fumigant.
Weng, Cindy; Napier, Cade; Katte, Cedric; Walse, Spencer S; Mitch, William A.
Afiliação
  • Weng C; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
  • Napier C; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
  • Katte C; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
  • Walse SS; Agricultural Research Service, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, USDA, 9611 South Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, California 93648-9757, United States.
  • Mitch WA; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
J Agric Food Chem ; 72(27): 15133-15141, 2024 Jul 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38944760
ABSTRACT
The post-harvest fumigant, sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2), is a >1000-fold more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide and methane. Pilot studies have shown that SO2F2 fumes vented from fumigation chambers can be captured and hydrolyzed by hydroxide (OH-) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at pH ∼ 12 in a scrubber, producing SO42- and F- as waste salts. To reduce the costs and challenges associated with purchasing and mixing these reagents onsite, this study evaluates the electrochemical generation of OH- and H2O2 within spent scrubbing solution, taking advantage of the waste SO42- and F- as free sources of electrolyte. The study used a gas diffusion electrode constructed from carbon paper coated with carbon black as a catalyst selective for the reduction of O2 to H2O2. Under galvanostatic conditions, the study evaluated the effect of electrochemical conditions, including applied cathodic current density and electrolyte strength. Within an electrolyte containing 200 mM SO42- and 400 mM F-, comparable to the waste salts generated by a SO2F2 scrubbing event, the system produced 250 mM H2O2 at pH 12.6 within 4 h with a Faradaic efficiency of 98.8% for O2 reduction to H2O2. In a scrubbing-water sample from lab-scale fumigation, the system generated ∼200 mM H2O2 at pH 13.5 within 4 h with a Faradaic efficiency of 75.6%. A comparison of the costs to purchase NaOH and H2O2 against the electricity costs for electrochemical treatment indicated that the electrochemical approach could be 38-71% lower, depending on the local cost of electricity.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ácidos Sulfínicos / Fumigação / Peróxido de Hidrogênio / Hidróxidos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ácidos Sulfínicos / Fumigação / Peróxido de Hidrogênio / Hidróxidos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article