Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comprehensive, multifaceted strategy to increase pediatric donor heart utilization.
Hollander, Seth A; Chen, Sharon; Dykes, John; Kaufman, Beth D; Lee, Ellen; Wujcik, Kari; Profita, Elizabeth; Schmidt, Julie; Rosenthal, David N.
Afiliação
  • Hollander SA; Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. Electronic address: seth.hollander@stanford.edu.
  • Chen S; Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
  • Dykes J; Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
  • Kaufman BD; Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
  • Lee E; Procurement Services, Stanford Medicine Children's Health, Palo Alto, California.
  • Wujcik K; Solid Organ Transplant Services, Stanford Medicine Children's Health, Palo Alto, California.
  • Profita E; Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
  • Schmidt J; Solid Organ Transplant Services, Stanford Medicine Children's Health, Palo Alto, California.
  • Rosenthal DN; Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38945282
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In 2016, we initiated a quality improvement endeavor to increase pediatric heart offer acceptance. This study assessed the effect of these interventions at our center.

METHODS:

We evaluted pre- and postimplementation cohorts (January 1, 2008-December 31, 2016 vs January 1, 2017-July 1, 2023) comparing donor heart utilization. Six interventions were iterated over time to increase offer acceptance ("extended criteria") ABO-incompatible transplant, ex vivo perfusion for distanced donors, 3-dimensional total cardiac volume (TCV) assessment, acceptance of hepatitis-C or Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 infected donors, and institutional culture change favoring consideration of donors previously considered unacceptable. Outcomes studied included annual HT volume, median waitlist duration, sequence number at acceptance, and post-transplant clinical outcomes.

RESULTS:

During the study period, annual transplant volume increased from 16/year to 25/year pre- and postimplementation. Three hundred thirteen of 389 (80%) listed patients were transplanted. Waitlist duration shortened postimplementation (p = 0.01), as did the percentage of accepted heart offers utilizing at least 1 extended criterion (p < 0.001). Institutional culture change and TCV assessment had the largest impact on donor heart utilization (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001). There was no difference in post-HT intubation or intensive care unit days (p = 0.05-0.9), though post-transplant hospitalization duration (p < 0.001) increased. Post-transplant survival was unaffected by the use of extended criteria hearts (p = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS:

We report a successful longitudinal, multifaceted effort to increase organ offer utilization, with institutional culture change and TCV assessments most impactful. The use of extended criteria hearts was not associated with inferior survival.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article