Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Major Trauma Triage Tool Study (MATTS) expert consensus-derived injury assessment tool.
Fuller, Gordon; Howes, Nathan; Mackenzie, Roderick; Keating, Samuel; Turner, Janette; Holt, Chris; Miller, Joshua; Goodacre, Steve.
Afiliação
  • Fuller G; University of Sheffield ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8532-3500.
  • Howes N; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Magpas Air Ambulance ORCID iD: 0009-0008-7117-7045.
  • Mackenzie R; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Magpas Air Ambulance ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6004-0993.
  • Keating S; University of Sheffield.
  • Turner J; University of Sheffield ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3884-7875.
  • Holt C; University of Sheffield.
  • Miller J; West Midlands Ambulance Service ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1990-4029.
  • Goodacre S; University of Sheffield ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0803-8444.
Br Paramed J ; 9(1): 10-22, 2024 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946735
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Major trauma centre (MTC) care has been associated with improved outcomes for injured patients. English ambulance services and trauma networks currently use a range of triage tools to select patients for bypass to MTCs. A standardised national triage tool may improve triage accuracy, cost-effectiveness and the reproducibility of decision-making.

Methods:

We conducted an expert consensus process to derive and develop a major trauma triage tool for use in English trauma networks. A web-based Delphi survey was conducted to identify and confirm candidate triage tool predictors of major trauma. Facilitated roundtable consensus meetings were convened to confirm the proposed triage tool's purpose, target diagnostic threshold, scope, intended population and structure, as well as the individual triage tool predictors and cut points. Public and patient involvement (PPI) focus groups were held to ensure triage tool acceptability to service users.

Results:

The Delphi survey reached consensus on nine triage variables in two domains, from 109 candidate variables after three rounds. Following a review of the relevant evidence during the consensus meetings, iterative rounds of discussion achieved consensus on the following aspects of the triage tool reference standard, scope, target diagnostic accuracy and intended population. A three-step tool comprising physiology, anatomical injury and clinical judgement domains, with triage variables assessed in parallel, was recommended. The triage tool was received favourably by PPI focus groups.

Conclusions:

This paper presents a new expert consensus derived major trauma triage tool with defined purpose, scope, intended population, structure, constituent variables, variable definitions and thresholds. Prospective evaluation is required to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness, acceptability and usability.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article