Impact of Appropriate Use Criteria for Cross-Sectional Imaging on Medical Decision-Making in Patients with Conotruncal Defects.

ABSTRACT

Associations between Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) ratings and medical decision-making in congenital heart disease are not well-established. We applied the 2020 AUC for multimodality imaging in follow-up care of pediatric and young adult patients with conotruncal defects to evaluate appropriateness of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and computed tomography (CCT) use in this population and impact on clinical decision-making. Records were reviewed and assigned AUC indications and corresponding ratings for CMR and CCT. We examined the relationship between AUC indications, their ratings, and change in management. Of the 200 studies (133 CMR, 67 CCT) performed on 187 patients, no studies were rated Rarely Appropriate (R), and most studies were obtained for routine follow-up (151/200 [75.5%]) and were not prompted by clinical concerns. There were 70/200 (35.0%) studies which led to management changes; these included transcatheter intervention (29/70 [41.4%]), surgical intervention (25/70 [35.7%]), other interventions (10/70 [14.3%]), and medical intervention (6/70 [8.6%]). Among all studies, studies prompted by clinical concerns and studies rated M more frequently resulted in change in management (46.9 vs 31.1%, p = 0.04 and 54.1 vs 30.7%, p = 0.003, respectively). In conclusion, we found that all studies were ordered for indications rated Appropriate (A) or May be Appropriate (M), indicating compliance in ordering practices as outlined by published AUC. Studies ordered for clinical change or rated M more frequently led to management change in patient care. Findings may help inform provider expectations of testing yield in this population and serve as a platform for development of future iterations of AUC.