Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Image quality of lung perfusion with photon-counting-detector CT: comparison with dual-source, dual-energy CT.
Remy-Jardin, Martine; Guiffault, Lucas; Oufriche, Idir; Duhamel, Alain; Flohr, Thomas; Schmidt, Bernhard; Remy, Jacques.
Afiliação
  • Remy-Jardin M; Department of Thoracic Imaging, University Hospital Center of Lille, LILLE, France. dr.remy.jardin@gmail.com.
  • Guiffault L; ULR 2694 METRICS Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, LILLE, France. dr.remy.jardin@gmail.com.
  • Oufriche I; IMALLIANCE-Haut-de-France, Valenciennes, France. dr.remy.jardin@gmail.com.
  • Duhamel A; Department of Thoracic Imaging, University Hospital Center of Lille, LILLE, France.
  • Flohr T; Department of Thoracic Imaging, University Hospital Center of Lille, LILLE, France.
  • Schmidt B; ULR 2694 METRICS Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, LILLE, France.
  • Remy J; Department of Biostatistics, University of Lille, CHU Lille, LILLE, France.
Eur Radiol ; 2024 Jul 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38967660
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the quality of lung perfusion imaging obtained with photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison with dual-source, dual-energy CT (DECT).

METHODS:

Seventy-one consecutive patients scanned with PCD-CT were compared to a paired population scanned with dual-energy on a 3rd-generation DS-CT scanner using (a) for DS-CT (Group 1) collimation 64 × 0.6 × 2 mm; pitch 0.55; (b) for PCD-CT (Group 2) collimation 144 × 0.4 mm; pitch 1.5; single-source acquisition. The injection protocol was similar in both groups with the reconstruction of perfusion images by subtraction of high- and low-energy virtual monoenergetic images.

RESULTS:

Compared to Group 1, Group 2 examinations showed (a) a shorter duration of data acquisition (0.93 ± 0.1 s vs 3.98 ± 0.35 s; p < 0.0001); (b) a significantly lower dose-length-product (172.6 ± 55.14 vs 339.4 ± 75.64 mGy·cm; p < 0.0001); and (c) a higher level of objective noise (p < 0.0001) on mediastinal images. On perfusion images (a) the mean level of attenuation did not differ (p = 0.05) with less subjective image noise in Group 2 (p = 0.049); (b) the distribution of scores of fissure visualization differed between the 2 groups (p < 0.0001) with a higher proportion of fissures sharply delineated in Group 2 (n = 60; 84.5% vs n = 26; 26.6%); (c) the rating of cardiac motion artifacts differed between the 2 groups (p < 0.0001) with a predominance of examinations rated with mild artifacts in Group 2 (n = 69; 97.2%) while the most Group 1 examinations showed moderate artifacts (n = 52; 73.2%).

CONCLUSION:

PCD-CT acquisitions provided similar morphologic image quality and superior perfusion imaging at lower radiation doses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The improvement in the overall quality of perfusion images at lower radiation doses opens the door for wider applications of lung perfusion imaging in clinical practice. KEY POINTS The speed of data acquisition with PCD-CT accounts for mild motion artifacts. Sharply delineated fissures are depicted on PCD-CT perfusion images. High-quality perfusion imaging was obtained with a 52% dose reduction.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article